User talk:Robccfc

Welcome!

Hello, Robccfc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Scott Burnett, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Burnett

A tag has been placed on Scott Burnett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Burnett

The article Scott Burnett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Needs sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 16:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal of WikiProject:Darts

I have proposed a new WikiProject, named WikiProject:Darts. If you think the idea was good, you can support this proposal there. Armbrust (talk) 01:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Baracat

I have removed your template for deletion on the Christian Baracat article, as rugby union internationals are noteworthy and your reasoning "The individual in question would like to request its deletion for privacy reasons and the fact that it affects his current professional reputation" is difficult to follow as there is nothing in the article in any way critical of him. You may want to familiarise yourself with the deletion process on Wikipedia, it is common curtesy to notify the author of an article of a proposed deletion. If you still fell, the article should be deleted, have a read of Wikipedia:Deletion policy and initiate a deletion discussion under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks, have a nice day, Calistemon (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaekn in a number of ways. It is not within my power to delete the article. If you, or Christian Baracat wants this to happen, you have to go throught the Articles for Deletion process, which is straightforward enough.

As to Christian Baracat being upset about the page, I'm a bit buffled, as more information on him is already available on Linked in and totalrugby.de as there is in this article and he doesn't seem to have tried to have those deleted. Personally, I would be extremly proud to have been capped five times for my country in any sport, but thats just me.

Thirdly, it seems a slightly arrogant view, that only rugby union internationals from the major nations like France or England are notable. While not a sport of the masses, rugby has a very long and proud history in Germany and the national team competed, in 2008-10, at the highest possible level in Europe, given that the six nations aren't open for promotion/relegation.

All that said, if Christian Baracat was really upset about the page, I would suggest sending an email to Wikipedia and, as you said, we wouldn't really be much worse off without the article and I certainly wouldn't object to deletion under those circumstances. A deletion however can only be carried out by an Admin, which I'm not. Keep well in Brussels, and say sorry to Christian Baracat if I upset him by creating an article on him. It was only for the purpose of improving the coverage on German rugby with no intention on upsetting him, Calistemon (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, send Wikipedia an email and go from there. Should this prove difficult or unsuccessful, get him to drop me an email instead. As the creator and only contributor, I can request speedy deletion under Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion G7. Calistemon (talk) 00:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Robccfc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Environmental Defense Fund Europe (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Environmental Defense Fund Europe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Environmental Defense Fund Europe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 09:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robccfc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 09:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Environmental Defense Fund Europe has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Environmental Defense Fund Europe. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Environmental Defense Fund Europe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Environmental Defense Fund Europe, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Environmental Defense Fund Europe

Hello, Robccfc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Environmental Defense Fund Europe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]