User talk:Robbierangers

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Soccer Manager (Website).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 18:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rangers (Football Team).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Rangers Football Club.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 02:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rangers

I can understand people being unhappy with the situation that is taking place on the rangers article, however there is no justification for making the sort of changes you did to the Celtic article. Such changes will be reverted and could be seen as vandalism, so it is not worth getting intro trouble over such things. The only way to get the situation sorted with rangers is for consensus to develop on the talk page. Its a case of being patient. BritishWatcher (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rangers Football Club.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal F.C.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arsenal F.C., did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —howcheng {chat} 23:49, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Newco Rangers was changed by Robbierangers (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887716 on 2012-08-06T18:18:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Progress is being made but it is important the second article is maintained to keep consensus, that article is about the company itself rather than the club so as long as it stays on that sort of focus it should not be too much of a problem. Please dont blank it like that again otherwise it could set progress backwards on the other article. Thanks BritishWatcher (talk) 18:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Celtic F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blethering Scot 20:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --John (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Classic XI (Fifa Football Video Game Club).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Celtic F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 04:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Celtic F.C. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Furthermore, this article is under a 1RR. You're way past that limit. Please stop adding information that's been reverted by other editors Shadowjams (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Celtic article

Just to note that you have been reverted 6 times on the Celtic F.C. article in the last month. All your edits have been POV pushing, and borderline vandalism. I advise you to cease with them now. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 09:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 22:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbierangers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account unfortunatly was misused by someone else, this was not me. I will take precautions to make sure this never happens again and I feel i can contribute a lot of reliable information on wikipedia. Thanks Robbierangers (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If that is indeed the case your account cannot be unblocked as we do not unblock compromised accounts - see WP:GOTHACKED Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 23:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbierangers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had accidently left myself logged in on a computer Robbierangers (talk) 12:22 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I see almost no to completely no constructive edits from this account anyway. Max Semenik (talk) 23:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbierangers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why an administrator would have blocked me, but I had accidently left myself logged in on wikipedia and my page was vandalised with an unnapropriate edit on the Celtic F.C talk page. This has never happened on my account before nor will it ever again. Their has been occasions where edits to pages where made by myself and were seen as unconstructive edits with no reliable sources. This is only due to the fact I am still learning how to use Wikipedia and I am now starting to get the just of things. I would like to continue to contribute to Wikipedia and now that I am understanding how to use it and provide reliable sources i believe this would benefit wikipediaRobbierangers (talk) 00:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have admitted to us that you allowed your account to become compromised; therefore per WP:GOTHACKED and basic principles of network security we will have to leave it blocked. You would be free to start another account as long as you acknowledge there those portions of your edit history here that you would like to lay claim to. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks I am happy with this :)

Factual accuracy award

	Factual Accuracy Award
	Keeping wikipedia correct, well done :) Shocking a ban took place :o Robbieranger (talk) 03:28, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much and thanks for the support :) Robbierangers (talk) 04:19, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Soccer Manager (Website) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Soccer Manager (Website), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.