User talk:Roaringboy

Welcome!

Hello, Roaringboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- MightyWarrior (talk) 13:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi there

I am responding because you did !! lol

This is a bit of a touchy subject, the Norwich FC and the Norwich page seem to have had some action in the past, but the rest of Norfolk is all over the place, for example see Prehistoric_Norfolk and look how its been left.

There are others like the North Norfolk page - just type north norfolk into the search box and you will find 8 different pages which come up, 3 are on the council and elections alone, and 2 separate ones, 1 for North Norfolk Coast and 1 for the coastal path.

I followed some links on the Norfolk page and found that it had been chopped up and was in a right state, so bad that it had been demoted.

Basically I think I (we if you help as you are the only person who responded lol) need to make a list of all the pages relating to Norfolk and then get an action plan drawn up as to what can /needs to be merged and what needs working on etc

Anyway, if you are interested, write back to me - cheers --Chaosdruid (talk) 10:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like the right approach. I've never conducted an exercise like this on Wikipedia, so working out the best methodology will be new for me. However, it certainly needs doing, as you point out. Apart from the haphazard way articles have appeared, the content of a number offer scope for improvement or correction.

Let me know how you would like to go forward, and I'm happy to help if needed. Roaringboy (talk) 13:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again

I am just waiting for a response from another highly active user on North and mid Norfolk pages, he has made them fairly comprehensive, so I need to see if he is on some sort of plan so we don't tread on each others toes - for example he has just joined the rivers project. He should have got back to me by end of the weekend and I'll let you know whats going on

My main idea is to try and get a Norfolk sub group set up so that it would be easy to check a page and drop in a link so we know what has and hasn't been done, but things like geography of ecach area aren't covered - I suppose the assumption is that htey are flat and the same, lol, but things like historical geography, for example no where mentions that it was easier to get to Holland than London from Norwich up until the 1800's

spk soon--Chaosdruid (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Shawl, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Smjg (talk) 00:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Southwold. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 00:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Beckett

Hello. I added the {{who}} tag to the text: "is widely considered to have behaved in an arrogant and impenitent manner". I added it because current public support was not mentioned in the Times article, so "is widely considered" was not really the right wording. I couldn't think of better wording at the time, so I just tagged it. The article's gone through a couple of changes since then, if you want to take another look and edit/discuss or whatever? --h2g2bob (talk) 23:33, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Norwich

Dragon Hall should be mentioned under musesums. That section could benefit from a few wikilinks as quite a few of the museums / places / organisations mentioned have their own articles. I'll let you work on the artice so that we don't get any edit conflicts. You might wish to use {{inuse}} or {{inuse-section}} while you're working on an article to let other editors know you're active on the article or section. Mjroots (talk) 10:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wanted to lay down the basis of the section to start, and planned to add wikilinks over the next day or two-the main problem being that Wikipedia is incredibly slow at the moment (for me at any rate). I was in two minds about putting Dragon Hall under Museums, and decided against pro tem, as I'd planned to visit it again shortly. On reflection, you're right. Any thoughts about the Guildhall, as I've seen that listed as a museum somewhere? Roaringboy 11:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Norfolk and Bellamy

Hi

I have replied on the Norfolk page Bellamy and notables - sry dont have much time as have family over and need to leave in 10 with them for a meal :¬(

keep up the good work :¬)

Chaosdruid (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roaringboy. You have new messages at Blue Square Thing's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Schools in Suffolk

Thanks, simple but stupid mistake! you're changes made perfect sense, schooling in Suffolk has been an interesting mess that many outsiders looked at with at least surprise! by the way Guildhall Norwich is not a classed as a museum and nor is it to my knowledge looking towards accreditation as one.Edmund Patrick – confer 05:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Having experience in one form or another of both, I'm interested in the changing face of the Suffolk education system, both State and Private; and especially the crash from top 30 LA performers in 2004 to 141 or 142 today (oddly coincident with the tenure of the present administration, beginning in 2005). Re: Norwich Guildhall - Perhaps I imagined it, but I seem to recall that there was a possibility of it becoming a museum to Chocolate, but that, or any other museum use, clearly hasn't come to pass.

As the author of the Museums section in the Norwich entry, I keep an eye on what's happening in that field. The next event due is the re-opening of the full Norfolk Regiment Museum display in the Castle in August. I hope that it is as good as the revamped Bridewell, where not all has changed, as the upstairs floorboards still creak like billy-oh. --Roaringboy (talk) 06:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Southwold may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southwold St Edmunds Nov 2015.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Southwold St Edmunds Nov 2015.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Roaringboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Roaringboy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Roaringboy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Articles for Creation is not for the submission of templates for testing. Templates can be tested in template space. If you have questions, please ask at the Help Desk.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Roaringboy/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Roaringboy/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:41, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roaringboy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:41, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Blyford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to East Suffolk

Bramfield, Suffolk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to East Suffolk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Suffolk (district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Suffolk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Norwich

Dear Roaringboy, good day!

I'm translating a book and I found this phrase "Like the o'er hasty man from Norwich"; do you can tell me it refers to what? I saw that you are a contributor of this page. Thank you very much! --Annie306 (talk) 09:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC) @Annie306: Hello.[reply]

Looking at the book you refer to, it is a set of verses for children, written in large part in rhyming couplets; either paired or alternate lines. The lines in question are:-

"Next to the Epicure we turn,
With a discerning taste in porridge;
Yet careful, lest her mouth she burn,
Like the o'er hasty man from Norwich,"

I think that "Norwich" is there because it conveniently rhymes with "porridge", and of course the number of words suitable for the book, and its younger readers, which rhyme with "porridge" is necessarily somewhat limited. The general meaning of the rhyme is cautionary i.e. the Epicure is careful not to eat very hot porridge lest she burn her mouth, which precaution the man from Norwich, who was "o'er hasty" (over-hasty, or "too quick") to eat his, did not take, and thus burnt his mouth with the hot food.

Other than the use of the city's name to fulfil the requirement for rhyme, there is no discernible or known direct connection, with Norwich people or events. However, you may be familiar with the limerick verse form of 5 lines, some of which (the more polite ones) derive from English children's rhymes, and there is at least one rendition rhyming Norwich with porridge; namely:-

There was an old woman of Norwich,

Who lived upon nothing but porridge;

Parading the town,

She turned cloak into gown,

This thrifty old woman of Norwich.

No doubt there are more similar examples.

As the book is in English, I guess that you're translating it into another language, but you don't say which. It's therefore a little difficult to make any useful suggestions as to how you could render it, but I hope the foregoing information is of some help to you.

Roaringboy 10:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

You are very nice, thank you!!! I want to translate the book into italian. Have a good day. Annie306 (talk) 21:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ps: look at this: con un gusto raffinato per la pappa al pomodoro/eppure attenta, perché non le bruci la bocca,/ Com’è successo all’uomo frettoloso di Codigoro; :-D Annie306 (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Annie306:

Thank you for your reply, and for the interesting limerick, which must be the first I have read in Italian. It certainly demonstrates the universality of human experiences, and their expression in words. "Tomato" and "Codigoro" do, however, offer a much sunnier and sophisticated image than Norwich and porridge, which, whilst being entirely healthy and nutritious, is not perhaps the most exciting food item one may find; even in the British Isles.

Anyway, may I wish you every success with your translation, and I would be most interested in any news of your progress. As we approach the end of the 2020 "Annus Horribilis", I also offer my best wishes to you for a brighter and happier 2021.

Roaringboy 10:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, happy new year to you! The book is short but very long for me :( ... take care, A. Annie306 (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]