User talk:Rnsharma1993

Speedy deletion nomination of Daily Forex Diary

Hello Rnsharma1993,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daily Forex Diary for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 06:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Daily Forex Diary. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Please stop removing CSD tags. As the creator of this article, you are not supposed to do this. GAB^gab 15:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rnsharma1993 reported by User:GeneralizationsAreBad (Result: ). Thank you. GAB^gab 15:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Please do not misrepresent yourself on your user page. [1] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Hvalpsund (city)

Hello Rnsharma1993, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Hvalpsund (city), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Osarius - Want a chat? 10:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My Concerns

Hello, thank you for fighting vandalism on Wikipedia, however I have some concerns about the way you are conducting it.

It appears you have already been involved in edit warring, removing speedy deletion tags from articles you have created, and I recently reverted a speedy deletion tag you placed on Hvalpsund (city) because it was incorrect.

As much as we appreciate help to fight vandalism, we must ensure we are not leaving chaos in our wake. Unfortunately, some of your efforts have left a rather large wake, which is very counterproductive. I recommend you read, understand and practice the guidelines we have already established in order to fight vandalism effectively, before you continue. A good place to start is WP:Vandalism. I must warn you - if you continue as you currently are, you could find your account blocked for disruptive editing.

Again, many thanks for helping - you are appreciated, but you do need to work on your methods. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me, or an administrator.

Osarius - Want a chat? 11:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: MailChimp

Hello Rnsharma1993, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MailChimp, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. So Why 19:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]