User talk:Rnajera

Ways to improve Josef Koch

Hello, Rnajera,

Thank you for creating Josef Koch.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating this article on a WP:PROFESSOR academic Josef Koch. As of now, there is only source that the article relies and it is connected to the institution, which is not sufficient. Please provide more reliable sources and footnotes. Some sources I was able to find, which might be useful include One Hundred Years of Philosophy. United States: Catholic University of America Press, 2019. and Rewriting the Middle Ages in the Twentieth Century. Belgium: Brepols, 2005. Please let me know if you have any questions.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ppt91 ^talk 15:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ppt91:

Hi,

So far I have just translated from the German Wikipedia page and used basica data directly from WikiData.

Thanks for the suggested sources. I could not find very much about Josef Koch in there, but there was very helpful biographical information about Albert Zimmerman, one of Koch's most renowned disciples (so to speak). If and when I have time I might add/edit a Zimmerman article.

Rnajera (talk) 12:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC) Rafael[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andreas Speer

The article Andreas Speer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:07, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andreas Speer

Hello, Rnajera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andreas Speer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andreas Speer

Hello, Rnajera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andreas Speer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]