User talk:Rmj12345

Welcome!

Hello, Rmj12345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

bibliomaniac 1 5 06:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: With your extensive edits, I was late in catching you, but it's still good to start a talk page positively.

Image:HenrySTaylor.jpg

Hi, you asked for help in determining the copyright status of Image:HenrySTaylor.jpg. The problem is that because Wikipedia is a free content encyclopedia, we have very strict restrictions on the use of copyrighted material. One of these restrictions is that copyrighted images of living people are almost never allowed, because it's easy enough for someone to take a picture of the person and release it under a free license (public domain or copyleft). Therefore, the image has been deleted. There are a variety of ways to acquire a free image to replace it, though. According to the article Henry S. Taylor, he's a professor at American University. If you're a student there, it should be easy enough to meet him and ask to take his picture. If you aren't, there are bound to be other Wikipedians who are students there; maybe you could ask at Talk:American University. The usual way of requesting a free image is to put the template {{Reqfreephoto}} on the talk page of the article. You can also put {{reqphotoin|Washington, D.C.}} to bring it to the attention of people in Washington, DC. —An gr 12:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Widespreadpanic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Widespreadpanic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

obama edit

Sorry - I saw your note on my talk page the other day and meant to check out what you were asking, but totally forgot. I'm actually not sure what you mean by losing the history - if you could elaborate, I'll be happy to try to explain. Tvoz | talk 03:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feministing

Hi there! I reverted a number of changes that you made to Feministing last night, trying to edit to appease your many legitimate points. (See more about why and how I restored certain edits on Feministing's talk page.) I reverted a lot of the edits because you deleted a couple of reliable sources that are important to establishing the subject's notability, particularly since the page was just created. I have a number of new sources that I plan on adding when I have a little more spare time, so please give me an opportunity (say, until the end of business today) to add these sources and expand the article appropriately before you bring your much-needed perspective to the article. :) I genuinely appreciate your help in making this article rigorous and solid. Thanks! RMJ (talk) 13:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, have your time. I'll re-check the article later. We talk at the article's talk. --Damiens.rf 14:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samhita Mukhopadhyay

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Samhita Mukhopadhyay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Appears to be a run-of-the-mill blogger. No apparent notability asserted

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Kite 01:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Samhita Mukhopadhyay

I have nominated Samhita Mukhopadhyay, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samhita Mukhopadhyay. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Damiens.rf 16:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Hollins University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. When you recently edited Trymaine Lee, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Albany and Camden County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing

Do you accept requests? Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely! What did you have in mind? :) RMJ (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Would you mind looking at I Could Fall in Love? Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Rmj12345! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Rmj12345! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hollins.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hollins.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Davidnelsonwiki.JPG

The file File:Davidnelsonwiki.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]