User talk:Rmartin271

Welcome!

Hello, Rmartin271, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as CandyWare, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CandyWare

The article CandyWare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion that anyone but Martin Bestawros has ever released anything under such a license; fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin Bestawros

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Martin Bestawros requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. NereusAJ (talk) 04:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CandyWare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CandyWare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CandyWare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 08:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rmartin271 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked by Reaper Eternal for the following reason(s): Deliberately triggering the Edit filter. I just made an account yesterday and kept getting this error. I did not do it DELIBERATELY and I didn't no it was a crime! please reconsiderRmartin271 (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm terribly sorry about this. I must have accidentally looked at the wrong edit filter log entry somehow. I thought you were trying to post "poop" vandalism to an article. Again, I'm sorry about this, and I have unblocked you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think Reaper was a little overzealous with the block, however I would suggest you read Wikipedia:Notability (people). Simply put, Wikipedia describes a notable subject, not makes one notable. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 17:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Rmartin271 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

24.246.67.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Rmartin271". The reason given for Rmartin271's block is: "Deliberately triggering the Edit filter".

Blocking administrator: Reaper Eternal (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have an open and active unblock request already above - one at a time, and as you're blocked directly, the above is the correct one to use (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are directly blocked. The only unblock request on this page should be the one above, since undoing the autoblock won't help you in the slightest. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 00:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Rmartin271 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

24.246.67.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Deliberately triggering Edit filter

Blocking administrator: Reaper Eternal (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are blocked directly -your unblock request above is the correct template to use. TN X Man 17:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/rmartin271

Hello Rmartin271. I noticed you, or another editor created a Requests for Adminship page under your name, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. Please note that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets an extremely high bar for potential administrator candidates. That being said, I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship, Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users, and Wikipedia:Not now, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering the same thing, as well. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 22:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Your addition to CandyWare has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cut-and-pasting from one Wikipedia article (Beerware) to another without attribution is a copyright violation. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]