User talk:Rlk89

Lacrosse

"Lacrosse is USA Lacrosse, UK Lacrosse is a variation of Lacrosse and should be treated as such." Sorry I don't quite get what you mean by this comment? Ozdaren 04:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what I meant was that the most standardized version of Lacrosse is the American Version mainly because it draws its roots from the same region. The sport was formed and “tuned” before it traveled out of America and into other continents. Rlk89 19:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joey

Hello, the Joey episodes you are making are stubs, please add

{{tv-stub}}

to them as you make them. Thanks! --Dom thedude 0 0 1 02:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem Rlk89 02:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joey's Magna Doodle

This is mentioned in Friends#Running_gags already. The article isn't likely to turn in to anything more than a stub or to suffer from WP:CRUFT if all of the messages are listed on the page. Better to do something like that on a friends/joey website than an encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude I was going to construct this like the simpsons couch gag. Rlk89 16:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted again. please do not recreate - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete any more without giving me a reason that gose against the previouse post. Why is it any different from the simpsons? Rlk89 17:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't, I will except that your are refuse to participate in discussion and recreate within the day. Rlk89 17:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my Talk page lacks civility but I will respond. Recreation of previously-deleted material is considered vandalism and can lead to you being blocked from editing for a period of time. You have been given the reasons for the previous deletion - obscurity and WP:CRUFT. This material is more suitable on a Friends/Joey website than an encyclopedia. The difference between the the Magnadoodle and the Simpsons couch gags are that the Simpsons quotes, parodies and satirises many notable artistic, filmic, literary and televisual references in a complex postmodern and intertextual web of meanings and cultural allusions. The Magnadoodle references achieved nothing like this nor were they intended to. As such, they are non-encyclopedic while the Simpsons couch gags are. (aeropagitica) (talk) 00:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, discussion finished you are right. Rlk89 00:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop

Please stop creating articles whose only content is a stub tag. It is considered vandalism. - Kookykman|(t)e 19:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm expanding them right now, sorry "my bad". Rlk89 19:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add your contributions to the article Donkey Kong (arcade game), and redirect the new articles to that. Thank you. - Kookykman|(t)e 19:44, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The DK related articles, to clarify. I have nominated the articles on Mario's Early Years! Fun with Letters and Mario's Bombs Away for speedy deletion. The given reason is: it is an article about a person, group of people, band, club, etc. that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. - Kookykman|(t)e 19:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They were Games released by Nintendo. I am in the process of expanding them. Rlk89 19:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know who released the games, but these articles are about either A) Clones of Donkey Kong (arcade game), which that article has a section for, or B) Non-notable Game & Watch/SNES Edutainment. The fact that these games were released by Nintendo does not make them instantly notable. - Kookykman|(t)e 19:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mario's Early Years! Fun with Letters and Mario's Bombs Away deserve thare own artical, I will admit that the donkey kong ones may have to just be a section of the original articals. Rlk89 19:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude These are significan subjects and you have now grounds to state otherwize. Rlk89 23:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When do you intend to expand Donkey Kong 2? Note that creating empty stubs may actually discourage articles from being created because a reader at another page will not see that there is a gap that needs to be corrected. Also, remember that any empty article can be speedily deleted according to WP:CSD, so many of these articles will just have to be recreated when you go back to expand them. Why not just wait until you are going to write the article before creating an empty one? —Centrx→talk • 01:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it right now. Rlk89 01:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help Me

I have a question, should stubs go before templates near the bottom of a page? Rlk89 16:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a general rule, I place category templates before stubs when cross-referencing a page. Doubtless there are counter-examples of mine but I prefer stubs last. When a page is expanded the stub will disappear but the categories will remain, so this will not disturb the layout of the categories. (aeropagitica) (talk) 19:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rlk89 14:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A proper welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on User talk:SilkTork. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! SilkTork 12:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poll

Hi! Welcome to the Beer project. Some work for you: Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: [1] SilkTork 12:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hostile

Please do not send angry messages or use hostile edit summaries when someone is simply trying to fix what he saw as vandalism done to your page. Please remember to be WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. These are very important things to remember when using our encyclopedia. Thx! =D --mboverload @ 00:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In now way was I hostile, I was asking what gave him or you the right to edit my page? Rlk89 00:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What the user did is that he saw something misplaced and decided to remove it, since you usually do not leave singatures on the userpage. But calling it vandalism is out of line, since that was not vandalism, since he was fixing a mistake by a new person. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 00:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, I never called it vandalism, except when identifying the edit which was a note for reference. The post by the IP address was intended, the revert was not. I can manage my own talk page if I need assistance I will request it. Rlk89 01:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also Zscout370 don't revert my own edits on my own User page Rlk89 01:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd tag removal

Please do not remove afd tags from articles as you did here. [2] Afd templates specifically ask you not to remove them and thus it is against Wikipedia policy to do so. If you disagree with the afd place you thoughts in the afd. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 01:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is the Rocko conflict not resolved? Rlk89 01:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what you mean by that. The Afd is ongoing, you are welcomed to add content to the article while it is ongoing, but you can not remove that afd tag. I didn't vote on the afd nor am I going to. I am just letting you know not to do that for future reference as the template specifically asks you not to. If you think that article should be kept go to the afd page and try to convince the other people who voted delete to change their votes.--Jersey Devil 01:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what you are doing with the redirects?--Jersey Devil 02:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new articles with the necessary citations, two different pages one including cultural references and one containing Rlk89 02:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should know that it is going to be viewed as you trying to avoid the afd from deleting the page. You should have just waited until the afd was over or tried to make your case in the afd page.--Jersey Devil 02:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The vote was largly for the deletion because of citation issues, I am resolving these issues in the two new articals. Rlk89 02:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary Usage

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Viridae ^Talk 03:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okey, are you sending this message for some page in which i did not do so? Rlk89 11:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

? Rlk89 01:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joey and the ESL

If the episode title is "Joey and the House" why is the article titled "Joey and the ESL" ? --Bookgrrl 03:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i copyed and typed it and forgot to change name Rlk89 21:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rocko

There's nothing that this article could become that shouldn't start out in the Rocko main article. If there's a large demand for the creation of a new article, create it later. Sparsefarce 16:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thare was an artical, but it was deleted because it didn't cite sorces. I have found sorces. So please stop.Rlk89

I'm still skeptical about it being a good article. Even if it's a brilliant, well-sourced article, I don't see anything that couldn't just go in the Rocko's Modern Life article. This material does not warrant it's own article. Just add this info in the main article, and let the community judge it that way. Sparsefarce 17:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This artical was larger than the rocko page itself.Rlk89 17:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CVG Box PR

I removed your link to the Peer Review of List of Mario games by year, because, as you can see by clicking on that link, it doesn't exist. The PR is empty. Also, assuming that you create it, it's common practice to add the link to the PR at the CVG PR page before adding the link to the box. Thank you! --PresN 22:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nicktoons - Rocko, Doug

I've noticed you've been a heavy contributor to the Rocko's Modern Life articles. I'm not sure if you're also a fan of other 90's Nicktoons, but if so, you may want to check out List of Doug episodes, where I've stubbed articles for all of the Doug episodes. Just wanted to let you know it existed. See you around! :) --Czj 01:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do some work on doug when I get a chance, thanks for the suggestion.Rlk89 01:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Grandfather_Wolf.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandfather_Wolf.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid BotRlk89 16:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Virginia_Wolf.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Virginia_Wolf.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid botRlk89 16:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My O-Town Edit

I mad the edit because it said on the Rocko's Modern Life page that O-Town was on the border of Michigan, and Canada. However, I had hastily made the edit without checking if there was a source for the Michigan/Canada info. It was not vandalism, it was just me making an edit too hastily. --BLuToRsE 04:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okey, no problem, thanks.Rlk89 03:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heffer

Yeah I found the info about Heffer's first apperance at http://www.tv.com/rockos-modern-life/no-pain-no-gain---who-gives-a-buck/episode/52625/summary.html

ThanksRlk89 23:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rene hardy

You recently created a short article titled Rene hardy. I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia already has an article about him. You can find it at René Hardy. I changed the Rene hardy page to a redirect to René Hardy --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Rlk89 22:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O-Town

Greetings! I noticed you left me a message concerning O-Town and Rocko's Modern Life. While I'm a fan of the show, I don't recall editing any articles relating to the program. I do seem to remember making a disambiguation edit (or some such) on an article referring to O-Town, but in this context it was as a nickname for Orlando, Florida. If I've erred, please feel free to undo my edits and please accept my apologies. -- SwissCelt 16:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! I see the problem now. Someone had written, on O-Town (disambiguation), "O-Town is a fictional town in Michigan Rocko's Modern Life". I simply cleaned the language up, writing, "O-Town is a fictional town in the U.S. state of Michigan in the animated series, Rocko's Modern Life." I was not the one who originally stated that O-Town is in Michigan. I simply failed to correct the error. Regards. -- SwissCelt 17:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

How did you get the this member is something about the wii project?

What?Rlk89 01:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The thing you got in yo page about "This member is a member in the Wiki Wii Project" in yo page, thanks --"P-Machine" 04:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Wii

Your recent edit to Wii (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Mario2small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mario2small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IESO

IESO has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this organization or company might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colbert

Please stop messing around with the Colbert case. You expressed your intention of having vandalised yourself (on Talk:Reality); then you "congratulated" PopeofPeru, now you re-create his userpage. It was deleted for a reason. You are on thin ice. Be warned that admins have absolutely no sense of humour when it comes to this incident. I unblocked Pope because I was reasonably confident he wouldn't be doing it again; I'm not so sure about you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Lovetest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lovetest.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rockospunky.jpg

Hello, Rlk89. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Rockospunky.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rlk89. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RML Char FDoctor Paula Hutchison.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RML Char FDoctor Paula Hutchison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rocko group.jpg

Hello Rlk89, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Rocko group.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rlk89. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marked for Deletion

A tag has been placed on Joey and the Christmas Party, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Article is not of wikipedia quality, nor is it a topic worthy of mention in wikipedia

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Texas Patriot - Frank 08:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Flecko.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Flecko.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RMLmotel4GR.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:RMLmotel4GR.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign

A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jenna Haze Oil Orgy

A tag has been placed on Jenna Haze Oil Orgy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — iridescent 02:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jenna Haze Oil Orgy

A tag has been placed on Jenna Haze Oil Orgy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — iridescent 04:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Jenna Haze Oil Orgy. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. — iridescent 04:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rlk89 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — iridescent 16:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiivolution has been blocked indef as a sock and you for 31 hours for sockpuppetry. Please don't engage in this again or you'll be indef blocked too. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jenna Haze Oil Orgy

Jenna Haze Oil Orgy, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Jenna Haze Oil Orgy satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenna Haze Oil Orgy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Jenna Haze Oil Orgy during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — iridescent 16:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jenna Haze Oil Orgy Blu-Ray.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenna Haze Oil Orgy Blu-Ray.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- LAX 20:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jenna_Haze_Oil_Orgy_Blu-Ray.jpg

I have tagged Image:Jenna_Haze_Oil_Orgy_Blu-Ray.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Core desat 03:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RML Mr Smitty.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RML Mr Smitty.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 14:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Lovetest.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Lovetest.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lovetest.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lovetest.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 14:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Bags a Neematoad

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Doug Bags a Neematoad, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Simpsons DVDs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Simpsons DVDs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of models and performers by cup size

I have nominated List of models and performers by cup size, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of models and performers by cup size. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RML Char Chuck and Leon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RML Char Chuck and Leon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mariofunwithlettersbox.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariofunwithlettersbox.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Image-MarioPreschoolfunbox.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-MarioPreschoolfunbox.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MarioFunWithNumbers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MarioFunWithNumbers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Becca Lish

I have nominated Becca Lish, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becca Lish. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Love tester

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Love tester, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marker Man Adventures

The article Marker Man Adventures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of significance whatsoever.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rlk89! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Laurence Mark - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gary Janetti - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joseph Malone (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Mandel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Daniel Palladino - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Matt Weitzman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
C. B. Harding - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Martin Olson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's Your Christmas Album (Bonus Track) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Here's Your Christmas Album (Bonus Track). Since you had some involvement with the Here's Your Christmas Album (Bonus Track) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rocko's Modern Life character

Template:Rocko's Modern Life character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the award

Thanks for the Barnstar award. I'm very gratified that you liked my chainsaw carving photo and others. I learn something with each contribution-Dwight Burdette-Dwight Burdette (talk) 02:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mariobombsawaysystem.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mariobombsawaysystem.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Good, The Bad, and The Wallaby / Trash-O-Madness

The article The Good, The Bad, and The Wallaby / Trash-O-Madness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sources are primary. No secondary coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Saturn Bomberman Fight Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Saturn Bomberman Fight Cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RML Char Ed Bighead.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RML Char Ed Bighead.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RML Char Spunky.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RML Char Spunky.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RML Char Filbert Shellbach.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RML Char Filbert Shellbach.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RML Char Bev Bighead.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RML Char Bev Bighead.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RML char Heffer Wolfe.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RML char Heffer Wolfe.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My archive is gone?

Did someone remove my talk Archive?Rlk89 (talk) 02:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bev Bighead for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bev Bighead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bev Bighead until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 18:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bev Bighead for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bev Bighead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bev Bighead (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Shin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Shin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Shin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 15:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna Thomson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Thomson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Thomson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marker Man Adventures listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Marker Man Adventures. Since you had some involvement with the Marker Man Adventures redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 07:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rlk89. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2 screen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2 screen. Since you had some involvement with the 2 screen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multi Screen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Multi Screen. Since you had some involvement with the Multi Screen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RML char Heffer Wolfe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RML char Heffer Wolfe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rlk89. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Killing Time in St. Cloud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing Time in St. Cloud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing Time in St. Cloud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BD2412 T 02:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"BS Super Mario Bros 3" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect BS Super Mario Bros 3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10#BS Super Mario Bros 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]