User talk:Rkleegemtsinai

This is Rkleegemtsinai's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Zolla-Pazner (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Highest citations are only 942 as a 4th author, not satisfying the applied standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner. Thanks! » Shadowowl | talk 19:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the image, as per your suggestion.--Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

advice

I've started working on the article. She is unquestionably notable, as a fellow of the AAAS, but the article needs some major improvements. WP is not a place for academic CVs--we include only a few of the most important papers, as judged by some objective criteria such as citations. In describing her work, we use selected key papers or review papers only, and we do not include vague claims such as "among the first" (nor do we claim the "first" unless there is a reliable 3rd party source that says it.) We don't use words like "innumerable"--un fact, it's better to use no adjectives at all. It is assumed that any scientist goes to many meetings and serves on review boards. We do not call her Dr. except in the introductory sentence. Charlie Rose is not a Reliable source for science. And WP cannot be used as a reference. Fix all this, and resubmit. I've started, but I leave it to you to do the rest. And, if you have any connection with her or her lab, please declare the conflict of interest. If you represent Mt Sinai, see our full information about WP:Conflict of Interst and our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure, andmake the full disclosure. let me know on my user talk page when ready. Otherwise, to avoidd eletion, I'll simply summarize the basics. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your helpful comments. As you surmise, I am connected with Mt Sinai/Susan Zolla-Pazner's lab. I work here as a medical editor, but I'm unfamiliar with the requirements of WP. I will work on the article as you suggest and resend it to you when it's ready. Again, thank you for your advice.Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, DG. Can you review my current changes and let me know if I'm on track--without it being a formal submission of the article? Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 20:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Zolla-Pazner. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 01:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it/can't find it....Sorry, I'm new at this. Can you direct me? Thanks Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Zolla-Pazner has been accepted

Susan Zolla-Pazner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I will continue to review biography and other style suggestions, and upgrade and update the article as time allows.Rkleegemtsinai (talk) 16:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rkleegemtsinai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]