User talk:Rjgodoy/2

Archive P20070222/0926

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sat5.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sat5.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sat5.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sat5.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

URI new text

please, see Talk:Uniform_Resource_Identifier#Simple_and_didactic_text... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.52.194.78 (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

(copied over from my talk page:) Well, thank you! A nice surprise! --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 22:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Smart Pointers

But isn't the smart pointer supposed to point to the object whatsoever?BTW is there a better way to reply in wikipedia than editing your talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagat sastry (talk • contribs)

(copied from User talk:Jagat sastry) Sure, it should be discussed in the article talk page. I have answered your question there.

Rjgodoy (talk) 03:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Aggregation in COM

…

It isn't like I'm always so snappy ;-) Thanks for the reply. I hope your right; if not I might have a second go at it. Shinobu (talk) 02:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)