User talk:Rjfc
Welcome!
Hello, Rjfc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Crstsk (talk) 08:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Brent 1990.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brent 1990.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 12:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
I own this image. What is the problem? Rjfc (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Rjfc:experiment/Brenndt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Nonnotable actor; fails WP:ENT. Outside of A Country Wedding, a review of movies and players presented in this article comes up empty. Simply not notable at this time.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cind.amuse 12:26, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above mentioned article has been userfied (moved) from the mainspace to a subpage of your userspace. It can be found at User:Rjfc/Brenndt. Please note that it is not a fraudulent act to either propose or subsequently delete articles that are not ready for transfer to Wikipedia's mainspace. Appropriate signatures of editors that make proposals for deletion are made in the edit summary, in addition to user talk pages. Please don't hesitate to ask others or seek help if you have questions. In all cases, please remember to assume good faith. Best regards, Cind.amuse 09:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]
Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Umm Ishaq bint Talhah) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Rjfc/The Imperial Family of the Serranilla Islands, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rjfc/ListofNwambanLeaders
[edit]Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Rjfc/ListofNwambanLeaders, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)