User talk:Rjbronn

Warning

Please don't add information about Azerbaijan from bi-sided points. --NovaSkola (talk) 04:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YOU MEAN DON'T ADD CITATIONS TO BOOKS THAT SHOW FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS AND ON EVERY MAP PRIOR TO THE 20TH CENTURY Azerbaijan was Persian (Iranian) territory and most Azeris (25 million live in Iran).

Persians are a people whose borders are the Mahat Mountains and Azerbaijan up to Armenia and Aran, and Bayleqan and Darband, and Ray and Tabaristan and Masqat and Shabaran and Jorjan and Abarshahr, and that is Nishabur, and Herat and Marv and other places in land of Khorasan, and Sejistan and Kerman and Fars and Ahvaz...All these lands were once one kingdom with one sovereign and one language...although the language differed slightly. The language, however, is one, in that its letters are written the same way and used the same way in composition. There are, then, different languages such as Pahlavi, Dari, Azeri, as well as other Persian languages.^[1]

THEY ARE RE-WRITING HISTORY WITH UN-SOURCED MATERIALS - AND VANDALIZING CITATIONS.

rjbronnRjbronn (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

You can write your view here --NovaSkola (talk) 04:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC) http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#174.28.41.201[reply]

Blocked

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rjbronn. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss and reach consensus with other editors before making controversial edits. Grandmaster 21:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please refrain from repeatedly reverting the articles without discussion at talk. Please be aware that the article in question is a subject to the general restrictions of the arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Thanks. Grandmaster 09:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon, I can see that he left lengthy and detailed discussions in the Talk sections of the editor and Admin -- Doesn't look like anyone had the intellectual honesty to address his points. FactPatrolFactPatrol (talk) 01:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

Blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rjbronn. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I feel for you, I don't think you should have been blocked. The Admin is totally out of line. Contact me by Email.

Peace. FactPatrolFactPatrol (talk) 01:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^ (Al Mas'udi, Kitab al-Tanbih wa-l-Ishraf, De Goeje, M.J. (ed.), Leiden, Brill, 1894, pp. 77–8)

[1] (Al Mas'udi, Kitab al-Tanbih wa-l-Ishraf, De Goeje, M.J. (ed.), Leiden, Brill, 1894, pp. 77–8)

[1]