User talk:Rivirian King of the Rails

Rivirian King of the Rails, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rivirian King of the Rails! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. An edit that you recently made to Donald Trump Jr. seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Calvin Coolidge— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

British Prime Ministers

British Prime Ministers are not numbered. Sam Blacketer (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To add a bit of background Rivirian: British Prime Ministers aren't numbered like US Presidents for several boring reasons. Firstly, the term "Prime Minister" wasn't used until the early twentieth century, before then the office was called "First Lord of the Treasury", in fact to this day the Prime Minister still is the First Lord of the Treasury, that's what it says on No. 10's letterbox. Another thing is, the United Kingdom didn't exist until 1801, before then it was Great Britain, so technically Robert Walpole was the first Prime Minister of Great Britain and Henry Addington was the last Prime Minister of Great Britain and the first Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Also, there is a debate as to weather non-consecutive terms are counted twice, like the way the Americans count Grover Cleveland, the Downing Street website says Gordon Brown will be the 52nd person to walk through the doors of Downing Street as PM not the 75th. Then there is the issue of how many times Ramsay MacDonald is counted as the government changed part way through his second term but he remained as Prime Minister. Finally, it's just not a British tradition to count the number people who have held a particular office. Regards - Galloglass 09:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above still applies, please do not readd the numbers. There is no basis for your edits' IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

President infobox edits

These changes are totally without explanation. In my opinion, they are detrimental to the biographies because, as soon as we begin listing every election that a candidate participated in inside the infobox, it gets very crowded and totally unreadable. Please stop. Thank you. Display name 99 (talk) 19:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Think about it. If we did this for the elections in which they participated in as presidential candidates, we'd have to do it for elections they participated in as candidates for vp, Senate, the House of Representatives, governor, or anything else. Quickly, the infobox becomes extremely difficult to read. The infobox is just a very basic summary of the article. Greater details should be left to the main body. Display name 99 (talk) 19:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:1RR

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rivirian King of the Rails. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rivirian King of the Rails. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at Talk:Elvis sightings. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. See WP: NOTAFORUM. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 20:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm MPFitz1968. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ringo Starr, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure you cite sources, especially for biographical information. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forest Lawn Memorial Park (Glendale), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Taylor and William Boyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Tkbrett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, While My Guitar Gently Weeps, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tkbrett (✉) 23:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#Possible serial synthesizer? regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I notice that many of your edits may not conform to Wikipedia:No original research because they appear to be your own analysis, unsupported by a reference. I appreciate that these edits are made in good faith with the desire to improve Wikipedia. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 13:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone many of your recent contributions for three main reasons: 1) State nicknames do not conform to WP:TERSE. 2) Statements about whether an event was the last/first one as of a date appear to be your original research, and not something cited in a source. 3) They are also problematic in that they would have to be tracked and updated when the status quo changes. I'm pausing in my reversions to give you the opportunity to respond. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 21:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Places in infobox

Hello, it's not necessary to add specific details such as hospital, borough, or county about the place of birth/death of persons. The infobox is meant to be a summary, so normally city/town (plus state or province if applicable) and country are sufficient. Please see Template:Infobox_person#birth_place. ... discospinster _talk 15:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, do not add unnecessary extraneous information to the infobox, it is supposed to be a summary. ... discospinster _talk 22:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rivirian King of the Rails (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not been sockpuppeting at all and have no idea who Bruce Fawcett is

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Very, very, very clear. Yamla (talk) 23:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rivirian King of the Rails (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account due to sockpuppeting. I fully understand the seriousness of this issue and the disruption it causes to the Wikipedia community. I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere apologies for my actions and to assure you that I have learned from my mistakes.

I created multiple accounts because I mistakenly believed that it would help me contribute more effectively to Wikipedia. However, I now realize that this behavior is against Wikipedia’s policies and undermines the trust and integrity that are essential to the collaborative nature of this platform.

In hindsight, I recognize that my actions were misguided and counterproductive. I am genuinely committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and contributing in a constructive and transparent manner moving forward. I have taken the time to thoroughly read and understand the Wikipedia policies on sockpuppeting and other forms of disruptive behavior. I am committed to using only one account and to participate in good faith within the Wikipedia community.

I respectfully request that you consider lifting the block on my account. I am eager to return to editing and to make positive contributions, following all community guidelines and policies. I appreciate the importance of building trust within the Wikipedia community and I am dedicated to rebuilding that trust through my future actions.

Thank you for considering my appeal. I look forward to your response and to the opportunity to prove my commitment to Wikipedia’s values

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated unblock requests are not considered. Checkuser verified abuser of mulltiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, just to be clear. You lied about your sockpuppetry over at User talk:Bruce Fawcett ("This account is not a sockpuppet"). You then admitted it. You lied about it here ("I have not been sockpuppeting at all and have no idea who Bruce Fawcett is") and were caught out in your lie. You now admit to lying to us. And, according to zerogpt, you are abusing an AI chatbot to generate this unblock request on your behalf. This is a pretty easy decline for the next reviewing administrator. It's hard to see you coming back from this. Good block. --Yamla (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rivirian, by all means tell me what your input in ChatGPT (or whatever) was to generate such a concise unblock request that pushes the right buttons, or at least attempts to. You're better at it than my students, and I'd like to learn from you. Drmies (talk) 01:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- This unblock request gave me a really good laugh. Hilarious stuff.
  I fed this prompt into ChatGPT 3.5: "Write me an appeal to a Wikipedia block enacted due to sockpuppeting. Ensure you apologize for your disruptive behaviour." I got almost a word-for-word response. It had the same paragraph breaks and used similar turns of phrase. Tkbrett (✉) 01:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - User:Tkbrett, thanks for the prompt--I copied it (is that plagiarism? no I guess it's fair use) and got a very similar result. Drmies (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  I realise what I have done was wrong. I promise from now on that I will only use one account to edit. Rivirian King of the Rails (talk) 06:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  We'd perhaps have a greater chance of believing you if you hadn't created yet another account, Gregtimas, immediately after making this request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivirian King of the Rails (talk • contribs)

I have

Confirmed the sockpuppetry. You are on the edge of being banned by the community under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 17:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]