User talk:River34

November 2013

Hello, I'm Oddbodz. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia is awesome seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Oddbodz (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gillotts School with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Alex^{discussion ★} 18:06, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Highdown School. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Highdown School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Trevj (talk) 19:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

River34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I know I have been stupid on wikipedia but I did not commit vandalism since my last warning. Infact I was editing the talk page of the user saying sorry for the trouble. I tried to save it but I could not because I was blocked.--River34 (talk) 23:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. No response from editor in about a month. Toddst1 (talk) 20:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK - what sort of editing would you do if unblocked? (Try not to be too vague...) Peridon (talk) 18:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

River34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am banned :(. I am a trusted user on The Simple English Wikipedia (I have rollback rights there). Will I have a chance of being un-banned if I wait 6 months without abusing multiple accounts?

Decline reason:

Admitted sock of Mr. Wiki Pro. -- John Reaves 22:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, to be clear, you are a sockpuppet of Mr. WikiPro? -- John Reaves 22:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is currect. Why do most of my sockpuppets never get tagged?--River34 (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As its been explained to you before, six months with no socking and you can request an unban. Consider the start date to be today. As far as tagging your socks goes, I imagine it's matter of WP:DENY and the fact that it is not a very important thing to do in the grand scheme of Wikipedia. -- John Reaves 22:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. See you in 6 months today :).--River34 (talk) 23:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]