User talk:Rishit.kumar.kundu

This is Rishit.kumar.kundu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Time Travel Through A Book (August 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Girth Summit was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This book that this draft is about appears to be self-published - it is exceedingly unlikely to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. See WP:NBOOK for more detail on those.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rishit.kumar.kundu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Girth Summit _(blether) 12:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I am assuming from your username that you are the author of the book. I congratulate you on writing it, and I hope it is successful for you, but Wikipedia isn't a place where you are permitted to promote your own works - see WP:COI for more on this. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 12:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Time travel through a book (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBOOK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Time travel through a book and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now what to do to make it published? Rishit.kumar.kundu (talk) 03:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have a significant conflict of interest. If you are the author of this book then self promotion is not supported and would lead to the article being deleted and you being banned from editing on Wikipedia. Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK

Hello Rishit.kumar.kundu,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sennecaster, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK for deletion, because it appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important and/or recognized enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sennecaster}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sennecaster (Chat) 14:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TIME TRAVEL THROUGH A BOOK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. see WP:SELFPROMO – NJD-DE (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]