User talk:Rishini Weeraratne

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rishini Weeraratne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Bjelleklang - talk 15:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Namal Rajapaksa without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 331dot (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Namal Rajapaksa has been reverted.
Your edit here to Namal Rajapaksa was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/namalsl, http://www.facebook.com/slbluebrigade, https://www.facebook.com/CarltonSuperSportsSL) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Namal Rajapaksa[edit]

Hi. I couldn't help notice that you made some large edits to this article. Please note that your edits have been reverted, and also that it has been the subject of a large discussion on the talkpage a while back regarding the content. If you have any issues with the content, please start at the talkpage by addressing the issues and sources raised there. If you choose to disregard that discussion you risk being blocked for disruption, edit warring or for pushing a a specific point-of-view. Bjelleklang - talk 15:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Namal Rajapaksa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. VeNeMousKAT (talk|contribs) 06:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article.

Greetings from Sri Lanka.

I hereby humbly request you to change the article which appears on Wikipedia - Member of Parliament, Hon. Namal Rajapaksa. The article contains a lot of false information and is quite misleading and harms his image. Most of the information in the article has been referenced to sites or online blogs which are politically biased and / or anti Government. Eg. TamilNet, The Asian Tribune, The Colombo Telegraph, etc. Information needs to be referenced to recognized forms of print media like the Daily Mirror, Daily News, etc. if it is to be considered legit.

Rishini Weeraratne (talk) 07:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the talkpage of the article located here to discuss issues with the article. The current article was the result of a fairly long debate a year ago, so please address issues raised in that discussion as well if you intend to change it. Your edits to the article so far has removed sourced information and replaced it with unsourced and biased information. Also note that Wikipedia has a number of policies and guidelines that address what kind of sources we can use for articles. Blogs are generally not to be used, whilst reliable independent sources are preferred. One of the sources you removed were from the BBC, which can hardly be called unreliable. Also note that you have been warned multiple times now, if you keep insisting on a complete rewrite of the article without discussing it first you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. Bjelleklang - talk 20:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]