User talk:Rinechift123

Welcome!

Hello, Rinechift123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Abraar Qasim, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 19:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abraar Qasim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abraar Qasim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 19:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shocking inquiry finds ALL cars tested by the Government smash lab test pollution

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shocking inquiry finds ALL cars tested by the Government smash lab test pollution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mother and lesbian civil partner accused of murdering toddler 'made another young boy sleep naked with his hands and feet bound with cable ties in a locked cage'

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mother and lesbian civil partner accused of murdering toddler 'made another young boy sleep naked with his hands and feet bound with cable ties in a locked cage', requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mother and lesbian civil partner accused of murdering toddler 'made another young boy sleep naked with his hands and feet bound with cable ties in a locked cage' for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mother and lesbian civil partner accused of murdering toddler 'made another young boy sleep naked with his hands and feet bound with cable ties in a locked cage' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother and lesbian civil partner accused of murdering toddler 'made another young boy sleep naked with his hands and feet bound with cable ties in a locked cage' until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peter Sam Fan 19:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please do not spam links to news stories on Wikipedia. If you want to create an article about an event in the news, you can do so through the article wizard. 331dot (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bad rollback!

Your edit here is clearly very bad.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cameron Smit

The article Cameron Smit has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Peter Sam Fan 19:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to A9 Road (Zimbabwe) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peter Sam Fan 19:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Country Liberal Party

Calling good faith changes 'vandalism' is highly punishable from what i've observed on wikipedia. What was vandalised? Do you just not like the improvements made? You cannot simply mass revert improvements to the article because you "just dont like them". Discuss please. Timeshift (talk) 19:22, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:22, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ADMINISTRATOR ATTENTION REQUIRED

This user has only just joined and every edit is a mass change claiming to revert vandalism. Administrator action required ASAP please!! Timeshift (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking into it. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I was just about to post a Vandal report! Crazy edits. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Several mass reverts labelled as vandalism each and every minute, dozens of them, and hasn't even had their account for an hour yet. Just look... this is a no-brainer. Perm ban needed ASAP. Timeshift (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: dangerous editor. How did you get an admin's attention so quickly? Is there a tag? HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything special, just lucky I guess. Though vandalising that many articles that quickly is sure to draw the attention of many in a very short period of time. Timeshift (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly someone (or some people) with an understanding of the system, though. Should be checkusered. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Timeshift (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Admin board

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HealthyGirl (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Using deceptive summaries is a serious matter. Please desist. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note

@HappyValleyEditor, Timeshift9, Charles Matthews, and HealthyGirl: I've reverted most of his edits and reported him to AIV. Peter Sam Fan 19:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rinechift123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I removed only spam links and false informations Rinechift123 (talk) 19:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The only false information here is the content of your unblock request. Your editing history is nothing but extreme disruption that will not be tolerated. The block is wholly appropriate. Kinu ^t/_c 19:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And I see this devolving in to a time sink very quickly, so your talk page access has been revoked. See WP:UTRS if you wish to file an unblock, even though I doubt you will find any success there. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rinechift (how close to Timeshift... hmm... co-incidence surely.), you only "removed spam links and false informations"...? You do realise we can see exactly what you've done and in what time frame...? Based on the link I just provided, it is crystal clear you're here to cause trouble and nothing else. Timeshift (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]