User talk:RilennEdits

RilennEdits, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RilennEdits! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WDLP Launch Advertisement, March 20, 1940.png

Thank you for uploading File:WDLP Launch Advertisement, March 20, 1940.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WKSM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiss FM. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Stein Mart, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, you need to stop adding "stuff you know" to so many articles. I'm cleaning up tons of unsourced content you have added. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The information I add to each page takes me anywhere from an hour to half a day at a time to compile from newspaper archives and library books. For my original purposes I have been more focused on getting the entire story together first than copying down every link to each figure piecemeal. Going back through the sea of sources I have combed through and finding the exact source for every single detail I've written down, after revising and splitting up info between paragraphs, is going to take so much longer than it took researching the information to begin with. When you have an article like Stein Mart, whose correct founding date isn't even listed on Wikipedia but is easily searchable via Google, I would hope despite the lack of a few references that someone took a fraction of their day to fill in some gaps in an already barely-cited article. You're the Mississippian, I invite you to disprove any of what I've written. I will be sure to cite more extensively if and when I ever contribute anything else to this website. Thanks. RilennEdits (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Return of the Durutti Column, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Declangi (talk) 22:44, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Jackson Hewitt and Munchos were also completely unsourced. Please stop your disruptive editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GOOD FAITH EDITS trump UNQUESTIONING REVERSIONS any day. Maybe look into the details I've put down for two seconds and help this website by corroborating them since I've fallen short, instead of playing the unquestioning jannie role and getting rid of my work outright. Enjoy your brownie points and continue to ignore me, I know your quantity over quality edit count is an achievement to you. RilennEdits (talk) 23:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]