User talk:Rigsella

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Emmreads, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 19:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 20:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with using primary sources and advocating for someone

You seem to have things a little confused and think that it's best to use primary sources and to write an article from the perspective of the subject of the article.

That would work for a website or a blog, not an encyclopedia article, which is supposed to have some distance from the subject and use secondary sources. See Primary and secondary sources. The point is to be objective and not a soapbox or means of advocating for someone.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]