User talk:Rico-rico1982
AfD nomination of Alfredo Chiacig
[edit]
I have nominated Alfredo Chiacig, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfredo Chiacig. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Samuel Sol (talk) 15:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Chiacig crime family
[edit]I have nominated Chiacig crime family, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiacig crime family. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Samuel Sol (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Alfredo Chiacig. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. The same is true for the Chiacig crime family article. Please check the discussion of it. Samuel Sol (talk) 16:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Alfredo Chiacig
[edit]A tag has been placed on Alfredo Chiacig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Chiacig crime family, you will be blocked from editing. -MBK004 17:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Chiacig crime family., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Samuel Sol (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Look, the article may well be factual, and that's fine. But, you need to provide sources for the article, as it makes negative statements about living persons. Please discuss the problem instead of removing the deletion tag, or you will like be blocked from editing for disruption. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
|
This user has been blocked indefinitely for vandalism. (see: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks) |