User talk:Richard Blatant

Welcome!

Hello, Richard Blatant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gears of War ^{Go 'Skins!} 03:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note

Yo Richard, great work on the Individualist anarchism article. Just a quick note: when adding quotes, like you did here, be sure to identify for the reader who the quote is from, and a little note as to why they are being quoted i.e. 'Scholar Susie Examplename says that "[quote]".' Is it Anderson, Labadie or someone else in this case? And on another note, if you haven't considered it already, you are more than welcome to join the anarchism task force. Solidarity, Skomorokh 20:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Got it. Richard Blatant (talk) 20:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of libertarianism template

I invite you to share your opinion about the nomination for deletion of the Libertarian sidebar. I am doing this since there appears to lack a broad range of libertarians reaching a consensus. Thank you for your time. PublicSquare (talk) 20:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agorism sidebar

I invite you to share your opinion about the nomination for deletion of the Agorism and Agorism sidebar. I am doing this since there appears to lack a broad range of libertarians reaching a consensus. Thank you for your time. 71.175.40.80 (talk) 16:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kevin Carson

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kevin Carson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Carson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Definition template

Hi! I can see that you changed the template {{Definition}} from a redirection to an own inline cleanup template with the text "when defined as?". While it is perhaps good that it is now a template with a distinct usage, I must say I find the question incomprehensible. What exactly is it asking? Is it asking for when something is defined (otherwise, why it start with "when")? Is it asking what something is defined as (otherwise, why does the question end with "as")? Or is it asking for both at once? What about rephrasing the text to make it more comprehensible, perhaps "definition needed" if the template is meant to prompt a definition? —Kri (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was bold and went ahead and changed the template text according to my previous comment. What do you think about the new text, is it suitable? —Kri (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]