User talk:Rhododendrites/2018a
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rhododendrites, for the period January 2018 - February 2018. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <tt> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
— <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></span> \\: — Rhododendrites talk \\
to
— <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\: — Rhododendrites talk \\
—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Resolved— Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for updating your signature. Sorry for not escaping the ampersand in
—, which needlessly made more work for you. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Sunday January 14: Wikipedia Day NYC Celebration and Mini-Conference
| Sunday January 14: Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join us at Ace Hotel for Wikipedia Day NYC 2018, a Wikipedia celebration and mini-conference as part of the project's global 16th birthday festivities. In addition to the party, the event will be a participatory unconference, with keynotes, plenary panels, lightning talks, and of course open space sessions. And there will be cake. We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC) | |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Cambodian Rock Stuff
Hey, just wanted to let you know that there has been some more chitchat of interest over at Talk:Ros Serey Sothea. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg) |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Gaillardia in Aspen (91273).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 16:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot 7 January 2018
|
|---|
|
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM: December 2017
| ||||||
This Sunday! Wikipedia Day NYC Celebration and Mini-Conference (updated speakers + schedule)
| Sunday January 14: Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 | |
|---|---|
 Part of Wikipedia's global 17th birthday celebration, Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 at Ace Hotel will include a mini-conference of scheduled panels as well as unconference style talks and discussions proposed by attendees on the day of the event. We are very excited to announce speakers such as Jason Scott (Internet Archive), Jackie Koerner (Visiting Scholar, Wiki Ed), and Andrew Lih (Wikimedia DC), as well as a fantastic line-up of panels that highlight projects and issues of relevance to the Wikimedia NYC community. See Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 speakers + schedule And there will be cake. We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Megs (talk) 02:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC) | |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrators
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrators. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
Editor
FYI, when you placed this tag, you probably didn't notice that a different editor made that edit. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- @AzureCitizen: Ah! I did notice, but then I wrote the wrong name anyway. :) Thanks for the note. Fixed now. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- No problem, all good... AzureCitizen (talk) 03:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Two of my favorite editors under the same header! I hope all is well with you both. (Rwaytz = Ruth666, by the way.) Rhodo, I haven't been ignoring your effort to re-focus the discussion on how to describe TST; I've just been hesitant to disrupt the relative calm there. I'll be returning my attention to it shortly, it seems. I'm going to stalk your edits to a DRV-in-progress first, and comment. I noticed Jobas has been active at the AfD and the article under discussion. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 22:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar!
'nuff said! DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 26
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
- Bytes in brief
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Bend in the Road Through the Forest has a new comment
This Month in GLAM: January 2018
| ||||||
Liev Tuk
Hey, last month we were in a discussion elsewhere about the folks on Cambodian Rocks and you mentioned trying and failing to find anything on Liev Tuk. Romanization of his name has been all over the place and I have seen references to Liv Tuk, Lieu Thaert, Ly Tek, and Leav Tek in various places, and there are probably more names out there but I believe they're all the same guy. Anyway I found a little bit of research on him. See this: [1]. Scroll down and you will see a description of the guy (as Leav Tek) at the bottom of page 8. Not enough for an article but it might soothe your curiosity a bit. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Doomsdayer520: Thanks. FYI I'm not ignoring this; just waiting for a free evening to jump into the multiple searches. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: While we're at it, I would like to do some serious work to clean up the Sinn Sisamouth article. If you have a minute, please see Talk:Sinn Sisamouth#Citations and Verifiability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:39, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 11
Check out this month's issue of the WikiProject X newsletter, with plans to renew work with a followup grant proposal to support finalising the deployment of CollaborationKit!
-— Isarra ༆ 21:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
February 21: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
| Wednesday February 21, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Megs (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC) P.S. You are also invited to Africa and the Diaspora Edit-a-thon @ Schomburg Center for Black Culture on Saturday February 24! | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
Thank you.
Hello Rhododendrites,
I followed your advice and the fake page has now disappeared. So, all done successfully, great thanks to you. All the best. Regards, Chris Oxford.Chris Oxford (talk) 18:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Chris Oxford: Good news. Thanks for following up on that. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (events)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (events). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Clarity on discussion
Hi Rhododendrites! I was typing up a reply over at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Concerning image changes on animal articles when it was closed. I just wanted to clarify that, while my initial comment focused on the image changes the user was making, I was not, at all disregarding their ability to choose lead images which feature the animal's full body. Rather, I should have been more explicit in pointing out their continued attempts to replace images which were obviously better than their pick – against MOS:LEADIMAGE, despite being told many, many times about the guideline and others related to images. (Such as multiple instances of moving the previous lead image they replaced to another position against WP:PERTINENCE.) I also did mention BRD in edit summaries and on an article talk page, but no actual conversation occurred on talk pages.
Without the ability to understand our image-related guidelines, I don't see how will they ever be able to contribute positively. I simply aimed to find a way to convey this to them, so I needed a more experienced editor who has more extensively dealt with new user behavior such as this. I have little doubt the user is acting in good faith (despite the rapid rate at which they swap images) but their insistence on obviously poor choices were disruptive in absence of discussion, not a content dispute. (e.g. this pick over the previous in November and still in place, this pick over the previous which I mentioned took way too much effort to fix, and this one multiple times (and others) over this featured picture). I'm just becoming impatient and annoyed, having attempted to communicate with them at least eight separate times since November. :[ Rhinopias (talk) 23:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Rhinopias: My comment was mainly to say that it's a debate I've seen multiple times, with no clear guidance, and that he/she should really consider BRD before it does result in sanctions. Of course, it looks like Swarm indeffed the account anyway, so my prediction about likely admin action was incorrect. :) FWIW if someone changes the picture for the worse, you would be right to just revert. If they keep doing it (as I know he/she has in this case), it is a problem, but an easily solved one that doesn't really need to have anything to do with image guidelines. I wonder if the best approach in the future might be to ping a wikiproject or other editors of the page for a third opinion. I'm generally happy to give a third opinion in matters for which my opinion isn't a given (i.e. where it would be canvassing), and I feel pretty neutral on the subject of animal pictures, so would be happy to jump in if that would be helpful (not that I know what I'm talking about -- it can just help to have even one other person involved sometimes). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Noted! The only other situation I've encountered long-term with an editor that didn't collaborate I posted on ANI successfully, so that's why I brought it there. But a WikiProject may be a good venue (if there's a) next time. I will say though that I think "an easily solved one" doesn't really account for this user's particular activity, which was especially significant in October/November (here). Many of the user's earlier image changes (which may or may not be beneficial) had misrepresenting edit summaries (like the anole one, "That's better.", or the various "Updating image"/"Image maintenance" or whatever) or didn't have one, so the edits that have followed are simple fixes or bot edits and the image change may have not been seen on many of the articles. It'd be different I think if a user is continually making a poor image change less often each day on higher profile species. Rhinopias (talk) 23:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your thank you
e.jpg)
Most of the time I assume that no one notices my editing, but your thank you is very rewarding and appreciated. The Very Best of Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 06:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Barbara (WVS): I just happened across SandyGeorgia's thread at WTMED and was happy to see you dove right into one of the articles. In addition to just being good Wikipediaing, it's an important subject that I would've had no idea was problematic if I read it for my own edification (the sort of thing I should do more of). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 06:37, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Barbara (WVS): By the way, you should check out the Visiting Scholars Slack channel. It's only just getting started, but if you don't already use a Wikipedia-related chat service, it might be up your alley as an easy way to connect with other Wikipedians. (it's in an email I sent a few weeks ago, though the invitation should've come separately). I'm hoping that it'll become a useful way to share sources, share topic ideas, ask questions, or anything else. No problem if you don't think it would be a good fit for you, though. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 06:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Sandy was right in insisting that articles on screening should rise to the top of the ProjectMed to-do list. I just roll my eyes when I take a look at the recent changes log and see so many edits related to pop-culture med/health articles. I'll take a look chat service, but I am already quite gifted in chatting and others might be better served by silence from my side of the peanut gallery. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 06:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Barbara (WVS): Ha. Just thought of it because of the "assume that no one notices" comment. :) If it's not of use to you, that's fine. A few of us are logged into Slack all the time regardless (Wiki Ed and Wiki NYC both maintain active Slack channels). I think Women in Red has a channel that I've been meaning to look into a for a while, too. I like that it functions both synchronously (like normal chat) and asynchronously (like posting a message for someone whenever they log in), but I appreciate that it could be redundant/unnecessary for others. :) Thanks again for all your work on that article. I'll leave you with this unrelated picture I just uploaded. At the Chinese New Year parade on Sunday, a brief encounter between a tiny colorful bird and a large colorful dragon. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 07:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Editing News #1—2018
Read this in another language • Subscription list for the English Wikipedia • Subscription list for the multilingual edition
Did you know that you can now use the visual diff tool on any page?
Sometimes, it is hard to see important changes in a wikitext diff. This screenshot of a wikitext diff (click to enlarge) shows that the paragraphs have been rearranged, but it does not highlight the removal of a word or the addition of a new sentence.
If you enable the Beta Feature for "⧼visualeditor-preference-visualdiffpage-label⧽", you will have a new option. It will give you a new box at the top of every diff page. This box will let you choose either diff system on any edit.
Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.
In the visual diff, additions, removals, new links, and formatting changes will be highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.
This screenshot shows the same edit as the wikitext diff. The visual diff highlights the removal of one word and the addition of a new sentence. An arrow indicates that the paragraph changed location.
You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode, which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and improving the visual diff tool. Their work board is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor, and improving the visual diff tool.
Recent changes
- The 2017 wikitext editor is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. It has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. The team have been comparing the performance of different editing environments. They have studied how long it takes to open the page and start typing. The study uses data for more than one million edits during December and January. Some changes have been made to improve the speed of the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual editor. Recently, the 2017 wikitext editor opened fastest for most edits, and the 2010 WikiEditor was fastest for some edits. More information will be posted at mw:Contributors/Projects/Editing performance.
- The visual diff tool was developed for the visual editor. It is now available to all users of the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor. When you review your changes, you can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. You can also enable the new Beta Feature for "Visual diffs". The Beta Feature lets you use the visual diff tool to view other people's edits on page histories and Special:RecentChanges. [2]
- Wikitext syntax highlighting is available as a Beta Feature for both the 2017 wikitext editor and the 2010 wikitext editor. [3]
- The citoid service automatically translates URLs, DOIs, ISBNs, and PubMed id numbers into wikitext citation templates. This tool has been used at the English Wikipedia for a long time. It is very popular and useful to editors, although it can be tricky for admins to set up. Other wikis can have this service, too. Please read the instructions. You can ask the team to help you enable citoid at your wiki.
Let's work together
- The team is planning a presentation about editing tools for an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation metrics and activities meeting.
- Wikibooks, Wikiversity, and other communities may have the visual editor made available by default to contributors. If your community wants this, then please contact Dan Garry.
- The
<references />block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. This has already been enabled at the English Wikipedia. If you want columns for a long list of footnotes on this wiki, you can use either<references />or the plain (no parameters){{reflist}}template. If you edit a different wiki, you can request multi-column support for your wiki. [4] - If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Thank you!
—User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)