User talk:Rhmostafa

May 2020

blinqnetworks.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rhmostafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm aware that because I used the same source website for providing citations it might seem like I was doing it for promotional reasons. I didn't understand that using the same source multiple times is considered a violation and now will pay attention not to do that in the future. However, I just want to point out that the sources I used were all prepared by experts in the fixed wireless field with proper statistics and research behind them. I double-checked the references before making the edits to the entries to make sure. So I thought they'd be helpful to include in different wikipedia entries on this subject matter since they're prepared by someone who's a leader in that field. Moving forward I'll try to use more diverse source websites and edit a different range of topics so my contributions are more valuable. I will read up on wikipedia policies and rules for editing to make sure i make the most valuable edits. Thank you and I look forward to continuing my contributions to wikipedia. Rhmostafa (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you're going to need to explicitly agree to not post links to blinqnetworks, given the obvious conflict-of-interest. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

@Ohnoitsjamie:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rhmostafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you, admin, for clarifying the rules. I really appreciate it since I'm new to the wikipedia community and am still learning. I now understand the conflict of interest and explicitly agree not to post any links from blinqnetworks again. I'll educate myself better on which sources would be most valuable and consult with other editors to learn more about the best practices in the future.

Accept reason:

The editor has met the conditions for unblocking that had been communicated by the blocking administrator. Chetsford (talk) 20:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]