User talk:Rgtr

Speedy deletion nomination of Accountability Scotland

Hello Rgtr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Accountability Scotland for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ish dar ian 12:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response 22 sept 2013. Accountability Scotland was started some 20 months ago in Glasgow. It has its own web site to be used for campaigning purposes - but in other respects it is much like other pages that you hold e.g. on Linn Park. The history of this organization is as important as its aims and objectives. — Eur Ing Richard Townsend-Rose MA CEng MICE Rgtr (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If its history is notable, what secondary sources exist that have written about it? —C.Fred (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incredible! To try and compare a park which has had a solid physical presence for hundreds of years with an ill-defined, recently created organisation. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your group is notable and writes about it on WIkipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linn Park

Kindly log in before doing any Wikipedia edits. Are you seriously suggesting that the title for the Linn Park article should be linnpark.org.uk? Another incredible idea! You consider its website more important than the place itself?? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dear oh dear. please read what i said..... the most information that can be found out about for linn park is on linnpark.org.uk. there is another lump on botany going up shortly ... and more history. and many many more links on archeology and transport. then more on the peoples thru the ages. then fish and the river - hydrology model - it has a unique model developed by paisley university, pollution measurement - glasgow university and so on and so on. — eur ing richard townsend-rose ma ceng mice Rgtr (talk) 09:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn a bit of English. Even before I say where is the link to it; where are its independent sources?--Laun chba ller 10:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richard, what point are you trying to make? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]