Jump to content

User talk:Rfaith09

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Rfaith09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Beartooth (band), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 02:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beartooth (band)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beartooth (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Rfaith09, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


January 2014

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Catoosa High School, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. There is no need to make all the separate edits you just made to the above named page. Just use the preview button! John from Idegon (talk) 22:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Catoosa Activity Center.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Catoosa Activity Center.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Don Smolenski

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Don Smolenski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/team/staff/don-smolenski/16990165-b3ab-4689-99e0-2028cbf10a20. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mike Coccia, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://issuu.com/unhathletics/docs/2011_unh_fb_media_guide_complete/23, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mike Coccia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You seem not to understand that you cannot simply copy stuff into Wikipedia for other places on the internet, as our copyright policy does not allow that. Please read WP:COPYOTHERS. If you have questions and ask them here, I will try to answer them; or you could visit the Teahouse (please see the invitation below). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Rfaith09, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please give this a try! It's enough to go there and say "I need help", and people will help you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Chris Conley (American football), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.georgiadogs.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/chris_conley_742368.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Chris Conley (American football) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have indefinitely blocked your account pending some indication that you understand and will comply with our copyright policies. You have been notified of these policies in the past and cautioned that a block would follow if you persisted. However, on June 5th you copied the text of this source into the new article you created on Straight, Oklahoma, and on June 27th you copy-pasted wide swathes of content from [1] into Daniel Smith (wide receiver). For a couple of examples:

Source text Article text
First-team pick as receiver on 2009 Associated Press Indiana Class 4A all-state squad ... named to Indiana Football Coaches Association Top 50 All-State team for 2009 as one of four receivers ... four-year starter as wide receiver for Clay High School in South Bend, Ind. Smith was First-team pick as receiver on 2009 Associated Press Indiana Class 4A all-state squad[2] and named to Indiana Football Coaches Association Top 50 All-State team for 2009 as one of four receivers. He was a four-year starter as wide receiver for Clay High School in [South Bend, Indiana]].
Saw action the final seven games of 2010 ... played against Western Michigan, Navy, Tulsa, Utah, Army, USC and Miami (Fla.) in Hyundai Sun Bowl ... registered one assisted tackle against Navy ... recorded a critical fumble recovery that helped set up a touchdown just after halftime in the victory over No. 15 Utah ... totaled 117 snaps on special teams. As a freshman in 2010, Smith saw action the final seven games where he played against Western Michigan, Navy, Tulsa, Utah, Army, USC and Miami (Fla.) in Hyundai Sun Bowl.[3] He registered one assisted tackle against Navy and recorded a critical fumble recovery that helped set up a touchdown just after halftime in the victory over No. 15 Utah.[4] He totaled 117 snaps on special teams

I've added bolding to the article text to highlight the issue - what we see is the content from the source copied in wide swathes with connector words added. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are. As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

As this has evidently been a pattern for you, I am opening a community copyright investigation to facilitate cleanup of articles where problems may still exist. If you have interest in contributing further to Wikipedia, please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and indicate your understanding of our policies and confirm that you are willing to comply, using the following template, curly brackets and all:

{{unblock | reason=[I have read the Guide to appealing blocks and about Sock puppetry about the other account raith09, i know now what i did was wrong now and won't happen again. I just figured out the password for my old account so i can request the unblocking. Also per blohcierekim this account was blocked years ago because of an added a picture that was uploaded by to an article, i know now that is wrong. If you would please give me another chance, i have learned from my mistakes and hope to rejoin wikipedia] ~~~~}}

You may also use this code to request unblock if you feel that your block is in error, but remember to explain why in the "reason" field, replacing the text [place your text here].

If you have any questions, you can ask them here. I will be watchlisting your page, but you can attract people by placing the code {{Help me}} next to your note. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Tukes for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Tukes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Tukes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 18:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gridiron Developmental Football League for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gridiron Developmental Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gridiron Developmental Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rfaith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and about Sock puppetry about the other account raith09, i know now what i did was wrong now and won't happen again. I just figured out the password for my old account so i can request the unblocking. Also per blohcierekim this account was blocked years ago because of an added a picture that was uploaded by to an article, i know now that is wrong. If you would please give me another chance, i have learned from my mistakes and hope to rejoin wikipedia Rfaith09 (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account was blocked because of your rampant copyright violations, which you haven't addressed at all. Nor have you addressed lying about your sockpuppetry just a few months ago over at User talk:Raith09. You'll have to work a lot harder to earn back the trust you violated here. Explain copyright and fair use in your own words, convince us you'll never again violate copyright, explain your attempt to mislead us, convincingly (so, "i thought that was deleted and this is the only account i have" isn't going to cut it), convince us you won't violate WP:SOCK again. Maybe then we'll consider unblocking you. Yamla (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rfaith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learn a lot about copyright violations since being blocked in 2015. I guarantee that i will not use any picture that are not my own since that was the issue 4 years ago. I apologize about they lying having more than one account. I have submitted for a deletion of raith09 where this is the only account i have. At the time, i truly thought I only had one account and that this account had been deleted but currently reading the deletion of a profile i found out they don't usually get deletion because all the changed people have made get deleted also. I now know copyright other peoples material without their consent or without referencing this a serious issues. When i was on my other account i didn't have any issues with copyright as i have learn through the years how it is wrong. The sock puppetry on my part was wrong and won't happen again. I'm taking the advice and trying to do everything right so i can be back part of Wikipedia. I promise to follow all the rules and any suggests to ensure nothing like this happens again. I plan to use my own words or to references any information that was received from another source. Reading the reason i was original blocked. I now know structure and language is copyright, i know better than to just edit a few words with the facts. I have read the copyright policies and Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing on how to rewrite articles. Rfaith09 (talk) 22:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Before we unblock you, could you explain copyright and fair use in your own words. PhilKnight (talk) 06:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rfaith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PhilKnight Copyright is when you use something that is legally someone else's without their permission such as using an article word for word or just changing a few words in it. Where the written article is not original and is copied from another person. It is also using a picture that is someone else without their permission. Which I have learn that even paraphrasing other people work is also considered a violate of copyright. Fair use is when you can use someones article but you have reference it and has to be brief to support you own writings. You can't just use someone writings as your own writing as that is copyright but using a small part of someones writing to support your on writing is a form of fair use. Rfaith09 (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time. Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rfaith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting another unblock request. I have stated what copyright and fair use is in my own words. I have own my own mistakes and learn from them. Can I please be unblocked so i can be part of the wikipedia community again. I don't know what else I need to do to prove that i have learn from my mistakes and won't let them happen again. Rfaith09 (talk) 22:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sock puppetry. Please address this if you appeal via UTRS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still haven't done what I asked. For example, you haven't addressed your attempt to mislead us, or your violations of WP:SOCK. At the moment, it looks like you are just wasting our time. You are likely to lose access to your talk page if you are unable or unwilling to address these. --Yamla (talk) 11:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. Enough time has been wasted here. This leaves you with WP:UTRS if your current unblock request is declined. You'll need to address your attempt to mislead us and your violations of WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 15:22, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lehigh Valley Storm for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lehigh Valley Storm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lehigh Valley Storm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul McDonald (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devante Davis for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devante Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devante Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kip Smith for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kip Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kip Smith (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan DeWalt-Ondijo for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan DeWalt-Ondijo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan DeWalt-Ondijo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Coccia for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Coccia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Coccia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SilceVarities.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SilceVarities.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Backyard Bowl.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Backyard Bowl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Union Redskins Logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Union Redskins Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Center of the Universe Festival

[edit]
Notice

The article Center of the Universe Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct festival that does not meet general notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 03:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Center of the Universe Festival.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Center of the Universe Festival.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rfaith09&oldid=1236244159"