User talk:Revlurk
August 2017
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan Mazdoor Kissan Party, you may be blocked from editing. Greenbörg (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Am not engaging in intentional disruptive editing, please assume good faith, engage and resolve dispute on talk page of PMKP. Revlurk (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Mazdoor Kisan Party article
[edit]- User:Revlurk ...Hello, I am writing to you because we both have gotten into 'Edit conflict' a couple times on Mazdoor Kisan Party article. All I was trying to do was to have at least 3 different references from Pakistani newspapers for the article. It had no references when I first started editing it. I was trying my best to add only quotations from the newspaper articles and not add my own points of view. Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Ngrewall, thanks for writing. I'm completely fine with the newspaper references you added, but I don't understand why you remove the "Democratic Organisations Series No. 4. Pakistan Mazdoor Kisan (Worker - Peasant) Party (MKP) June 1984" reference? This booklet is where most of the information in the article comes from, and thus you removing it by extension undermines the foundation of the article. I'm chalking this up to a simple mistake on your part, if not please explain your change. Revlurk (talk) 23:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- I am NOT in the habit of removing anybody's reference! That was not my intent. Wikipedia staff has been reviewing my work for some years now. They are in a better position to judge this. My best guess is that it somehow got deleted, when I ran into 'Edit Conflict' twice in a short period of time while trying to 'Save page' and save my work. Let's not waste any more time on something minor like this and move on. Ngrewal1 (talk) 02:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ngrewall, I suggest you calm down, I do not see any reason for you to get upset over an apparent non-issue you yourself categorize as minor. As I originally stated, I chalked it up to a mistake on your part, and my assumption seems to be correct since you are not aware of deleting any reference although the article history clearly shows you doing so. In conclusion, since you did delete the original reference by mistake, I humbly ask for you to simply be aware of the reference and not do it again. I'm happy we're in agreement, please continue editing the article as you see fit and if you have any further inquiries don't hesitate to start a discussion on the article talk page or here on my User talk page. Revlurk (talk) 10:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Revlurk, I have tried to calm down. Since we hardly know each other, I'll just mention something here. I have never 'reverted' anybody else's edits during my 5 years of editing on Wikipedia. It's just something that I personally don't like to do, and obviously I don't like it when it's done to me. I am very transparent on my User page and invite you to take a couple seconds to read it...and also sincere about what I say on that page. If you have any concerns about my edited work in the future, please do me a favor and drop me a note on my Talk page. What recently happened was an 'honest mistake' on my part where your reference got deleted without me being aware of it. Ngrewal1 (talk) 02:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Revlurk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loyola Guzmán, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Frente Amplio and National Executive Committee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)