User talk:Reviewreviewer1
October 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 04:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones. Thank you. Sven Manguard Talk 04:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sven Manguard Talk 04:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Your name is reviewer, you are inserting reviews. Not a good sign of objectivity, it seems like original research. Furthermore, for statements that broad on such a highly trafficked area of Wikipedia, you will need to have sources to back up your edits. Remember, Wikipedia is not a place for you to air your own personal views. Sven Manguard Talk 04:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talk • contribs) 05:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)See also: User talk:83.128.72.45
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PM800 (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbR8Nj90gag&feature=related, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfBhi6qqFLA, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irQdE0hOhdQ. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PM800 (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sven Manguard Talk 01:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]I'm not sure why you're singling me out. Your edits to that page have been reverted by about five other users besides me. There is consensus. Just let it go. - PM800 (talk) 01:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thank you for adding information, however you have not supplied any references to support your additions. SCΛRECROW 11:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SCΛRECROW 12:16, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Obviously you're not getting the picture here. Your edits are not even properly formatted, and the sources you are supplying are not compatible with WP:RS. You need to discuss what you are trying to do at Talk:Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, and gain consensus before adding material to the article. If you continue down this path, the next block is likely to be indefinite. Looie496 (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC)