Jump to content

User talk:Retilian Kitten Eater

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Retilian Kitten Eater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 18:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your question

[edit]

Just to let you know, the little black m means the edit is minor, e.g. spelling corrections. Its done by checking the box directly under the edit summary box when editing a page Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 18:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Retilian Kitten Eater 18:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes sarcasm doesn't come across in electronic form.
I just wanted to let you know that I was fine with your edit to the Kinsella article. We didn't need the two sources particularily if you feel that one might contain libel. Although Kinsella actually linked B to David Irving and not Zundel on that page. I don't know if he used the Zundel thing elsewhere on his website. --JGGardiner 20:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The whole Kinsella "enemies list" thing is too shabby for Wikipedia. Retilian Kitten Eater 22:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Were the Nazis even funny on Hogan's Heros? =) It was a little before my time. I remember reading an article about how Nazis automatically conjure up a humourous image in Britain. That was in relation to the Prince's Nazi costume. Nazis make a convenient segue into the other issue. Is it resolved now? I didn't actually see the new Kinsella article but I gather you're okay with it? I'm not sure what Bourrie had to do with Iriving anyway. The only thing I know of was something that Bourrie wrote which supported Irving's prosecution in Austria, if I recall correctly. --JGGardiner 05:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for your contribution.

Do you live in British Columbia? Do you recall the specific cover of the magazine I mentioned? If you don't then you do not have the slightest clue of what you are talking about or the references to which I made. Also: I don't want to nor do I intend to be rude, but: I don't care what you think.

I hope I have made myself clear?

Again, I thank you again for your contribution. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Miked789 (talkcontribs) 18:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Mahoney

[edit]

I don't know if Mahoney is running or not. The editor that put it on his article didn't really have a source for it. Although the other candidate's blog did confirm that they are in a band together. Maybe he should get together with Kinsella. Although somehow I don't see Mahoney doing punk. --JGGardiner 05:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. The Citizen website has this story[1] but not his formal announcement yet. If somebody wants to add it with that kind of citation, I wouldn't mind. But personally I'll wait until official announcement. --JGGardiner 21:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]