User talk:Retau

Welcome!

Hello, Retau, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- - K a s h ^{Talk | email} 23:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)´[reply]

Thank You very mutch Kash

What makes you think Jamshid is Kurdish?

I can't read the Persian liner notes on my albums, but nothing I've seen about Jamshid suggests that he's Kurdish. What makes you think he is? Zora 19:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, nothing makes me think, I know

Well you have right on one point and that is, you can´t read the Persian liner notes on your album.

and if you now want to know if he is Kurdish or not, here is your answer: he has said that he is Kurdish and it has been written on newspapers and he has Kurdish songs even on his albums, I will link a adress to the article later..

That´s why I think Jamshid is Kurdish.. the problem with Kurdish musicians and historic Kurds is that they have been automatic Persian, Turkish and Arabic, but the truth is always there you can´t hide it.

Kurdish Cities

I have added data to this article. If you create an article and don't put any information in it, it can be speedy deleted as a very short article. While I am not wedded to the wording, you should make sure that the article is expanded otherwise it runs the risk of deletion. Capitalistroadster 02:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You blanked this page leading to it being nominated for speedy deletion. This is widely considered to be vandalism I have reverted it back to previous entries. Wikipedia works through a collegiate process so please don't do that. If you continue to do this, you may be blocked from editing for a period of time by administators such as myself. Capitalistroadster 01:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

above pasted here from Talk:Retau (wrong place; not user's talk page) --Moby 08:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sharafk_661.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sharafk_661.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oki, it seems that people can talk how they want and accuse someone to be another

I am new here and don´t now exactly how to write and answer to some stupid comments.. these words are wrong choosen, for second I don´t understand why the admin even listen to this people on of their kind. as I have said before, I want to make it clear to everybody what is what and what is not User:Retau

In my view you are innocent till proven guilty so I will treat you like a newbie.

One thing you need to learn is civility. You dont declare comments by others as "stupid". See WP:NPA for this rule.

We have a set of rules and processes we use. You cannot just try to change that. You have recreated something wikipedia comunity decided was not approporate and I am refering to the stub type you have created which was deleted.

I do not understand what you mean by 'what is what and what is not'.

--Cat out 19:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment removed from log page

You recently added this comment to the Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/Deleted/March 2006 page. Note that this page is for logging stub deletions by WP:SFD and so is not an appropriate place for the comment. I have therefore removed it. --TheParanoidOne 20:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate that

Your words are true.

``I want to make it clear to everybody what is what and what is not`` By this I mean, I am seeking the truth and look for the truth, because what is the meaning with false information if the purpose is to destroy and mislead readers. Wikipedia is a big name because it allows all kind of (Right) information and offer reader around the world deep and specific fact and let us see with our own eyes that create a lie is easy but to hide the truth is hard. So facts from a person that think he can change how mutch he want because his purpose is to mislead readers and to create confusion which is a 7-11 job among X- number users. If he want, he can open a internet site and write what ever he want to be written and the seccond alternative is to visit google for articles which describes Bush´s Indian background and what about his palace in Dubai, For such kind of persons there is no place here. And the most important part is, when you read something you will quick find out the truth with or without reference, because you can lie, But the words can not lie..

Retau out Thank You

Thanks and please help

Thanks for putting the Kurdish name on Hasankeyf; are there other Kurdish names for cities in Kurdistan that you can add? It would be helpful, these are always being attacked by Turkish, Iranian and Arabic editors and I think it adds to the encyclopedic value of the Wikipedia to have all the relevant names -- it is also WP policy. Good job! Carlossuarez46 22:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess u are talking about Category:Kurdish provinces. just a better wording and clean up... I did not change anything special:) --Hectorian 00:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know you could had done it as well. BTW, do not forget to sign your comments... --Hectorian 00:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done:). i have made some grammatical corrections in your user page (hope u do not mind) and some of the articles u have started. --Hectorian 00:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting

Either add {{delete}} to a page or {{db|(add your reason here)}}. —Khoikhoi 01:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Three-revert rule

You should read-up on the three-revert rule and how to report violations of it (Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#Report new violation). Take care. --Moby 13:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. re [1]: wrong place, wrong format and not a violation (yet, at least). Read the rule carefully and do not report non-violations. Please don't be so eager. --Moby 13:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Edit war

Both of you – please do not edit war. Try talking to each other. --Moby 14:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moby, how can you talk with a guy that hates your background don´t recognize you and most of all does everything he can do destroy you and makes you look like a fool. I mean everyone knows that east turkey is Kurdish dominiated and even turkish cities have kurdish majority. If he can´t stand the truth, and call me terrorist and babykiller. I don´t make Istanbul Kurdish because it lives over 4 million Kurds there, and in Mersin which kurds are majority in and Adana, but I want it make it right by adding the Kurdish cities with a Kurdish majority not turkish ones If I do that then I am on a wrong trace.

--OtrO DiA OtrO DiA 14:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well talking to people with different views, even abhorrent views, is part of participating in a wiki. The talking may not go anywhere, but at least it shows that you tried. Always be sure to remain civil and please try to avoid baiting people. See: WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL.

Also, I don't understand your sig... --Moby 14:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC) (and I'm gone after this post; later)[reply]

kurdish majority

sorry but your maps are meaningless, they are not reliable--Hattusili 14:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

only thing I say is that your sources must be more reliable--Hattusili 20:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

from reputable and neutral encyclopedias, organisations, institutes, universities etc.--Hattusili 20:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

--Joann e B 19:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ghassemlou.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ghassemlou.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SadeqSharafkandi.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:SadeqSharafkandi.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

wp:sockpuppet

Seen this: Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser#Retau ??? Care to comment? --Moby 10:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your categories are on CFD

--Moby 11:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cool Cat's disruption of Kurdish categorization efforts

Care to comment? --Moby 13:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Please refrain from making comments as you did in your edit summary here, as attacks on other users are not tolerated. Users are not required to run there edits by an admin, nor are you free to rever edits that you disagree with. If there is a conflict over a page's content, discuss it in a civil manner on a content basis on the article's talk page. --InShaneee 21:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit: Again, please do not accuse other users of adding 'propaganda', along with making other such comments ("save it for someone else"). Wikipedia policy requires that we be respectful to all other users. --InShaneee 16:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion of Kurdish musicians article

Hi Retau -- I proposed speedy deletion of the Kurdish musicians article you started -- nothing against Kurdish musicians, just that there's nothing in the article and there's no need for it because there's a category by that name, and this is the sort of thing that categories are for. There's also an article on Kurdish music. Joriki 08:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reza Jamshidi

A tag has been placed on Reza Jamshidi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Saligron 05:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kawe Khosrawi

I have nominated Kawe Khosrawi, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kawe Khosrawi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. DarkAudit (talk) 21:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Helen Krulich

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Helen Krulich, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Helen Krulich seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Helen Krulich, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Retau! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Pariwash Malakshahi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mustafa Hijri - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pariwash Malakshahi

The article Pariwash Malakshahi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any reliable sources for this poet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mustafa Hijri

The article Mustafa Hijri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

According to Nautilyus this article, Mustafa Hijri, should be deleted from wikipedia because there is no a reliable source claiming he is a notable person, and the source does not say anything about him.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xionbox^₪ 08:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Javad Sharifi

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Javad Sharifi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Pburka (talk) 03:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Javad Sharifi

The article Javad Sharifi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of subject's notability or importance. I can't find any sources on Google Scholar or Books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Javad Sharifi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Javad Sharifi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jalil Ahangarnejad

The article Jalil Ahangarnejad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. No indication of notability. No significant coverage found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 18:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]