Jump to content

User talk:Rereiw82wi2j

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pbritti (talk) 12:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Pbritti (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because my name showing. are u bot Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removals

[edit]

Hello Rereiw82wi2j. If you continue to make unexplained removals, as you did at Control (management), you are risking a block from editing. I also notice some removals of other people's talk commants. EdJohnston (talk) 02:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i thought its practice not showing other people because its say fix grammar spelling Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 12:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 02:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rereiw82wi2j (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The reason that i delete my writings in discussion section is because my name is showing and account is deleted. But ok i dont delete it again unlock ban pleas Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 06:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The reason that i delete my writings in discussion section is because my name is showing and account is deleted. But ok i dont delete it again unlock ban pleas [[User:Rereiw82wi2j|Rereiw82wi2j]] ([[User talk:Rereiw82wi2j#top|talk]]) 06:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The reason that i delete my writings in discussion section is because my name is showing and account is deleted. But ok i dont delete it again unlock ban pleas [[User:Rereiw82wi2j|Rereiw82wi2j]] ([[User talk:Rereiw82wi2j#top|talk]]) 06:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The reason that i delete my writings in discussion section is because my name is showing and account is deleted. But ok i dont delete it again unlock ban pleas [[User:Rereiw82wi2j|Rereiw82wi2j]] ([[User talk:Rereiw82wi2j#top|talk]]) 06:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

If you vanished your prior account, why did you create a new account and then draw attention to your prior account by removing discussions you were involved in? Technically this means that the vanishing should be reversed. (per WP:VANISH: "If the user returns, the vanishing will likely be fully reversed, the old and new accounts will be linked, and any prior sanctions or restrictions reinstated.") 331dot (talk) 09:21, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account meant to reverse vanished account because my name and surname cannot changed not for vandalism Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not every comment needs to be an unblock request. Please place new posts at the bottom, this may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". What I'm saying is that you are drawing more attention to your name by trying to remove it and it can now be associated with this account. In addition, as you have returned, that technically means the vanishing should be reversed. Vanishing is only done for people who intend to never return. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a privacy issue, you could have exclusively removed your name rather than deleting the entirety of your comments and the comments of others. Instead, this has had something of a Streisand effect. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok i never delete again this ban is meaningless please unlock Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leaving aside the vanishing issue for the moment, what edits do you intend to make? 331dot (talk) 19:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article named Hephthalites-Gokturk raid 616-618 adding information and source Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 20:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've brought this to other admins for discussion. If you have any comment, you may make it here. 331dot (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks bro Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 21:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
so reason is what Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
so whats the result Rereiw82wi2j (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]