User talk:RenegadeCenobite

Greetings, seeker. You may ask any question of me you wish. But be warned: Ǐ Đŏ Ñőť Ŗëșρθ₦ḏ Ẁ€ḷḹ Тό Ḉṟḭṭịḉḯṧṃ.

ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ 05:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC) ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ 05:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC) ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ 05:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC) ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ 05:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC) ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ 05:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC) ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ 05:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm JoJan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Henry Morton Stanley because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! unreferenced addition JoJan (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

areferenceditnowsorryspacebarisbrokenthanksẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ... Ǐ Đŏ Ñőť Ŗëșρθ₦ḏ Ẁ€ḷḹ Тό Ḉṟḭṭịḉḯṧṃ 22:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke was changed by RenegadeCenobite (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896941 on 2012-12-20T22:37:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot I accept your judgment. Thankyou for your guidance in this matter, as in all things. If I might ask, who programmed you? ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ... Ǐ Đŏ Ñőť Ŗëșρθ₦ḏ Ẁ€ḷḹ Тό Ḉṟḭṭịḉḯṧṃ 22:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RenegadeCenobite, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi RenegadeCenobite! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Alicia Silverstone. Thank you. [1] [2] (Other problematic edits, though not BLP problems: [3] [4] [5]) --Ronz (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It's neither of those things. I'm using a more accurate term than "kiss-feeding". What she did was to spit chewed-up food into her son's mouth. It says so in the reference. Arguing over it is like arguing that all references to sexual intercourse on Wikipedia should read "making whoopee". ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ... Ǐ Đŏ Ñőť Ŗëșρθ₦ḏ Ẁ€ḷḹ Тό Ḉṟḭṭịḉḯṧṃ 02:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start by noting that you're not defending your first attempt. I think you should quit there and move on to another article.

So your second attempt might be seen as a good faith attempt to be more descriptive, but it's an incorrect description and is your own, personal viewpoint. --Ronz (talk) 03:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not defending my first attempt because I think it was too rough - my contempt for her behaviour outweighed my desire for accuracy. Nonetheless, I still maintain that the practice of spitting food into the mouths of one's offspring is a practice which has existed for thousands of years only amongst animals such as birds, and that it is cruel to give one's child a ridiculously stupid name like "Bear Blu". Jamie Oliver is guilty of a very similar cruel act against his infant son. The second attempt is entirely accurate. Check the Daily Mail reference. The article in fact goes further than either of the changes I made in criticising the practice of spitting food into a child's mouth. ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ... Ǐ Đŏ Ñőť Ŗëșρθ₦ḏ Ẁ€ḷḹ Тό Ḉṟḭṭịḉḯṧṃ 03:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified the disputed content to actually better follow a better source, eliminating any need to rely upon anyone's personal opinions on the matter. Do we need any further changes? --Ronz (talk) 03:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nah mate I'm sound as a pound that I found on the ground. Peace and love x ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ... Ǐ Đŏ Ñőť Ŗëșρθ₦ḏ Ẁ€ḷḹ Тό Ḉṟḭṭịḉḯṧṃ 03:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Padded cell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 75.66.245.189 (talk) 06:42, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tags

Please don't add {{stub}} to an article which already has a specific stub tag, as you did, twice, to Sieroszewice: it's just a waste of other editors' time as well as your own. And please remember that stub tags go at the end of the article, not the top or the middle (per WP:ORDER). If you want to suggest that a particular section needs to be expanded, use {{expand section}}, not {{stub}}. Thanks. PamD 21:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ẈỄ'ḸḼ ṪḜḀṘ ỶƠṴṜ ṠǾṸḶ ḀṖẤṘṮ... Ǐ Đŏ Ñőť Ŗëșρθ₦ḏ Ẁ€ḷḹ Тό Ḉṟḭṭịḉḯṧṃ 23:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dian Fossey because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 11:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Padded cell, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. I also restored the warning the IP editor gave to you. Widefox; talk 07:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "RenegadeCenobite", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because customised user/talk page links. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. ..all indicating a disruptive username / combined with history of vandalism/disruption Widefox; talk 07:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]