User talk:ReneeDechert

This is ReneeDechert's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zach Agnos (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QEnigma was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zach Agnos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QEnigma talk 14:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ReneeDechert! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QEnigma talk 14:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

I noticed that you have been marking many of your edits as "minor". At Wikipedia, "Minor edit" has a very specific definition. It refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out.

I apologize for the error. ReneeDechert (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize. It's a "house rule" at Wikipedia, so it's not something you would be expected to know in advance. Happy editing. _signed,Willondon (talk) 17:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]