Jump to content

User talk:Renamed user kjfe93nioalksd98h

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Slb1900, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your recent edit to an article that is part of the Latter Day Saint movement WikiProject. We welcome your contributions and hope that you will stay and contribute more. Here are some links that I found helpful:

If you run into a dispute, please use the Talk pages and the Latter Day Saint movement project talk page to discuss subjects (especially controversial ones) to help reach consensus. But don't be afraid to be bold!! Also, as new Mormonism-related articles are created, please make sure to add them to List of Latter Day Saint movement topics.

Remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 01:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Book of Moses

[edit]

You changed Be-Reshit to Be-Re***** - I hope that was your software. Dougweller (talk) 09:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I had one person whose software kept changing the spelling of something, and he was convinced it was me at first - he was more than a bit embarrassed when he found out what had happened (and I thought for a short while he was a vandal!). Dougweller (talk) 18:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Redlinks are appropriate in cases here the subject redlinked is certainly notable. All high schools are notable. Hence redlinks in this situation (Antelope Valley Union High School District) are perfectly acceptable. John from Idegon (talk) 00:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll desist since there's an argument against (it's really just one of those whim-edits), though I would say for the sake of reply that a school doesn't need a redlink to be notable; on the other hand, if it were of Wikipedia-level importance (and I believe it is), an article should be made for it. A redlink could actually suggest its importance is less than Wikipedia-level. Nevertheless, I've said my peace, and I'll leave it as it stands. Thanks for the comment. Slb1900 (talk) 00:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Riverton, Utah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Payson and Herriman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lehi High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Asian, Caucasian, Eagle Mountain and Lehi
Box Elder High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to FFA
Canyons School District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to ACT
Northern Utah Academy for Math Engineering and Science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ogden
Pleasant Grove High School (Utah) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peak

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Slb1900. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]