User talk:Renamed user 864c542a23313621/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

About Mann Mayal

First, Salam. Second i saw your message regarding Mann Mayal's edits, and i want to let you know that i respect your concerns and edits but what you did in the lead section of article was not upto precise merit, it should be presentable and be written in a point that contains the essence of article. With that being said, it means it also be presented in a periodic way for readers to read it easily. However i have made some changes that i think should serves article to rest. Please do not think that i have intervene and question your edits. And about serial gener, it just not Romantic but also a family drama and serial drama. Wikipedia is a free source and anyone by following Wikipedia's code of conducts can address issues in a manner so that we can understand each other to avoid edit war / edit conflict remaining civilised. Thank you for your message. Looking forward to work together, if need any help i will try to my best to help you. Nauriya (Rendezvous), 17:36, April 5, 2016 (UTC).

@Nauriya: If you created an article it doesn't means that only you have a right to edit it. Everyone is allowed to make changes but you removed my edits without giving a solid reason. And please educate yourself "serial drama" is not a genre your can't add it by saying this is a serial drama and "family" is genre for animated films or cartoons. Please see Children's film. You don't have a right to remove my edits by saying that my edits are not good. I'm not doing any violations in my edits to Mann Mayal. I'm now reverting your edit and please don't revert my edit back before discussing on talk page of the article otherwise it will be considered that we're engaging an edit war. Please let others contribute as well.
Thank you.--Musa Talk  11:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

@Musa Raza: You don't get it do you!. Children's film a.k.a Family Film and Family Drama is simply known as Drama, are two separate genres, you are contradicting yourself dear. And Serial (radio and television) is a gener/type of programming, which states "a serial has a continuing plot that unfolds in a sequential episode-by-episode fashion." And i didn't made any changes in your (or so mine) edits, i rearrange the order of paragraphs in lead section. I tried to be very nice, but your tone of writing doesn't seem appropriate, so you better give me reason why your edits are more appropriate and strong. And see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. Nauriya (Rendezvous), 20:28, April 5, 2016 (UTC).

@Nauriya: Do you have a source which says this is a serial drama? And I asked you to start a discussion on talk page of the article but you reverted my edit. Now it is not wrong to say you are engaging an edit war. I don't know why you don't let other users to edit the article you created.--Musa Talk  12:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

@Musa Raza: I have already post it on talk page and don't revert until issue is resolved. Nauriya (Rendezvous), 20:28, April 5, 2016 (UTC).

@Nauriya: I asked you to refrain from engaging an edit war but your behavior is so disruptive. And do you have a source for genres?--Musa Talk  12:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

• I am not engaging in any edit war, and yes i don't have any primary source for that, because such drama serials are typically Pakistani dramas that doesn't require any confirmation unless they are heavily based on elements that are different from our culture for example Mor Mahal is an epic fantasy historical drama which are not common for Pakistani dramas and thus requires confirmation. And Serial Drama/Drama Seial doesn't necessarily need any confirmation as they are no different than a drama and it is just a genre in which story is told in serialized way that is specially made for tv/radio. Moreover Family drama is a compliment to Drama and you may considered it as its sub genre. So all genres such as serial drama, family drama and romantic drama summarise only one genre that it is Pakistani Drama. Basically our serials are a lot more different than American TV Series where genres are heavily dominated and describes it. So with all explanation no sources has been published by media outlets specifically on serial genre but they called it, "romantic love story", "drama serial" during their reviews and articles. Some of tertiary and secondary sources are listed.

1. Source for Romantic G.: http://www.thenews.com.pk/magazine/instep-today/94642-Mann-Mayal-a-simple-love-story
2. Source for Drama Serial / Serial drama G.: http://nation.com.pk/blogs/15-Feb-2016/mann-mayal-is-attempting-to-make-girls-more-expressive-and-bolder

You brother need to understand that we are here to make things easy not difficult, because i may need your help near future... who knows! and this article is not my property and i definately doesn't own this. Your edits on lead section create clumps, it needs to be clean and presentable way. All edits are welcome unless they make sense and seems appropriate. I hope you understand Nauriya (Rendezvous), 21:30, April 5, 2016 (UTC).

@Nauriya: The show is just called 'drama serial' it is not a genre. You're adding wrong info and not letting others to remove it.--Musa Talk  14:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Mumtaz Qadri

On 10 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mumtaz Qadri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pakistani policeman Mumtaz Qadri was executed for killing the former Governor of Punjab Salman Taseer, who spoke against the blasphemy law and in favor of Asia Bibi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mumtaz Qadri. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Montargull (La Vansa i Fórnols)

Thanks Musa for your note on deleting this page. This page was under the title of Montargull, but I have published the article Montargull (Artesa de Segre) (another village in Catalonia with the same name) and so created a disambiguation page in Montargull and moved its content to Montargull (La Vansa i Fórnols), which was its original content. Anyway, if you give me a couple of days I can extend this article a little bit to make it acceptable. Cheers! --Wgarcia (talk) 09:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:KDM cover.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:KDM cover.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Don't post crap on my talk page

You just posted a phony warning/template on my talk page. The template you posted is designed for use ONLY when a user has removed a speedy tag from an article they created. Distorting the template and changing its text to improperly suggest that non-admins may not decline or remove speedy nominations at best suggests you do not correctly understand speedy deletion policy, and may call your good faith into question. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Bankster

Musa Raza. About the Bankster page this is a reliable source. I'm from the crew of the film. Please let the changes remain as they are factually correct. Thank you Rudi deltoro (talk) 11:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

BANKSTER

@Musaraza about the Bankster page this is a reliable source. I am from the crew of the film. Let the changes remain as they are factually correct. Thank you Rudi deltoro (talk) 11:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Bankster

Please use the talk page and don't revert each other any more. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bankster edits

You were within your rights to revert. But this wasn't about the content, just the way of getting the best results. You were also within your rights to post templated, escalating warnings, but maybe a better way is just to seek his understanding in the kindest way possible. A handwritten note takes a little longer, but often saves time in the long run. It can also help a newcomer have a better experience and possibly become an editor. Let's see how he responds to my note at my talk. It has a fair chance of gently helping him understand, but maybe he will still insist on the content going in the article. We shall see. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Tina Turner

Hello. Please do not replace pictures of the actual person with those of other people posing as statues of Turner. Thanks. Dr. K. 20:05, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

@Dr.K.: Sorry about that. I thought she's real.--Musa Talk  20:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for understanding. Dr. K. 22:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hassan Khan (Actor)

The article Hassan Khan (Actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established, fails all criteria at WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 12:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Waiting (2015-16).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waiting (2015-16).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)