User talk:Renamed user 864c542a23313621/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Nomination of Justin Bibis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Bibis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bibis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 01:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Open Medicine article

Hello Da Wikipedian,

Thank you for your review and comments. Open Medicine (journal) page is not unambiguously promotional, since it is an open access journal with unrestricted access and unrestricted reuse of it's piblicatins (according to open access model). This page is was creaded based on Open Mathematics article as an example. Could you please kindly inform what specifically information seems to be promotional and what should I add/remove so it won't be deleted. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floraljay (talk • contribs) 10:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imran Khan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Imran Khan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Valley (2016 film)

The article The Valley (2016 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL, WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Wasell^(T) 14:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saila Kariat

The article Saila Kariat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obviously not notable per WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Wasell^(T) 14:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Saila Kariat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saila Kariat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saila Kariat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Wasell^(T) 14:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Valley (2016 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Valley (2016 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Valley (2016 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Wasell^(T) 14:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

page Karan Singh Grover

please add the same photo in KSG's personal life? the one with him and bipasha?120.19.7.57 (talk) 10:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

SPI

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mnaqvii. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

• I didn't pick up on this earlier until you requested that the draft article for Haji Springer be moved to the mainspace, but it looks like you're Mnaqvii evading a block. I understand that you were frustrated that you were still blocked, but opening up a new account is not the way to go about returning to editing. This is sockpuppetry and block evasion, two of the worst things you can do on Wikipedia. Now here are some of your problematic behaviors:

1. Despite clear indication at the talk page for the Mnaqvii account that opening up new accounts was considered to be unacceptable, you opened a new account rather than try to continue to seek an unblock on the main account.
2. You have engaged in edit warring in the past to the point where you were blocked back in September by Mr. Stradivarius, which makes me concerned about your editing as a whole.
3. You don't seem to have a truly firm grasp of notability and sourcing on Wikipedia, and I see where you've continually had articles nominated for deletion in one format or another. You've also made quite a few controversial changes to articles, some of which clearly went against policy.

There's more to this and I see that you've posted below, so I'll respond more there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Requesting unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Renamed user 864c542a23313621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Tokyogirl79 You blocked me. Is there any evidence that I'm a sockpuppet? I'm a User from Pakistan. And I don't know where that user came from. I have also uploaded my picture on the Userpage. Please prove it that I'm a sockpuppet before blocking me. I have created many salted articles but this doesn't means that I'm using multiple accounts. Your behaviour is disruptive you just blocked be without giving a prove. I have read Wikipedia:Sockpuppet and it says you have to prove it by edits. Please compare my edits and with that user and do other investigation. And then block me if you have a prove. I'm a user from Pakistan and he may be from some other part of the world.--Musa Talk 06:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Upon investigation I have found further evidence to indicate that Musa Raza and SMusaRaza are the same person. I will not reveal it here but will email it upon request. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Here's the evidence against you:

1. Your username is identical to that of a confirmed Mnaqvii sockpuppet, SMusaRaza.
2. SMusaRaza edited Haji Springer, an article that the Mnaqvii account also edited.
3. Like the Mnaqvii account, you have a history of heavily editing articles on Pakistani rappers.
4. Your username is the same as an article that Mnaqvii tried to add to Wikipedia repeatedly, Musa Raza.
5. This account was opened only months after Mnaqvii tried unsuccessfully to get their account unblocked.

These are far, far too many similarities for comfort and I'm sure that if I dug more, I'd find more. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

• You've also edited some of the same articles, like Bohemia (musician) and I also note that the other accounts also edited on the same types of films and shows that you've edited on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79: I created my account with the username Da Wikipedian but I requested to move it to Musa Raza and it was moved. And if two you users with same name edit a same article, It means they are same? No! I have are 100% sure that I'm that user. Please prove it. And if not please unblock until you prove it. When I create one article, I find other articles from the first one and same happened in the case of Haji Springer. You rejected my request cuz I have same name as the other user. Have you read Wikipedia policies? You can't block me like this.--Musa Talk  07:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KDM cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KDM cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)