Jump to content

User talk:ReliableAssam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, ReliableAssam, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

ReliableAssam, good luck, and have fun. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much ReliableAssam (talk) 17:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Chaipau (talk) 22:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ReliableAssam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account is not sock ReliableAssam (talk) 04:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technical logs (CheckUser evidence) says otherwise. Either own up to your other accounts, or provide a solid reason as to how technical evidence would show you as being the same as another account. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@CaptainEek: I know only about Assam. So, I edited Assamese pages. I tried to remove factually incorrect things from Assam , Kamarupa and Kamakhya temple. One day i copied and pasted already available citation from Ahom kingdom to Assam to counter a POV push (Ahom_kingdom#cite_note-7 to Assam#cite_note-13). One day, I tried to remove POV push related to image of one idol or statue https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Kamakhya_Temple&diff=959549617&oldid=959545964. I can click a photo with A.P.J Abdul Kalam but i can't use his photo for my official use, So, I tried to remove inappropriate claim of Ahom from Kamarupa idol or statue. Most of the Assamese pages are edited and controlled by single editor Chaipau. He accuses new editor and block them. Facts always remain constant. I tried to be factual. Sorry, If my edits were disruptive. Thank you. ReliableAssam (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ReliableAssam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know only about Assam. So, I edited Assamese pages. I tried to remove factually incorrect things from Assam , Kamarupa and Kamakhya temple. One day i copied and pasted already available citation from Ahom kingdom to Assam to counter a POV push (Ahom_kingdom#cite_note-7 to Assam#cite_note-13). One day, I tried to remove POV push related to image of one idol or statue https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Kamakhya_Temple&diff=959549617&oldid=959545964. I can click a photo with A.P.J Abdul Kalam but i can't use his photo for my official use, So, I tried to remove inappropriate claim of Ahom from Kamarupa idol or statue. Most of the Assamese pages are edited and controlled by single editor Chaipau. He accuses new editor and block them. Facts always remain constant. I tried to be factual. Sorry, If my edits were disruptive. Thank you. ReliableAssam (talk) 10:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui 雲水 10:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui: Thank you. Actually, I am unable to understand about technical issues. I had given explanation about my edits. I believe in facts. If facts aren't allowed in WP then i am in wrong place. Pages edited and controlled by single editor can never be unbiased. Thank you . ReliableAssam (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ReliableAssam&oldid=960350667"