User talk:Rehana Hawladar

Welcome

Hello, Rehana Hawladar, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Rehana Hawladar, good luck, and have fun. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sir. Rehana Hawladar (talk) 15:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unblock request: Hi there I do not know why I am autoblock everyday.I cannot able to edit anything?Please help me to find out the problem. Thanks sir.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rehana Hawladar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I don't know why I am auto block everyday.I do use opera mini.So when I try to edit but I won't able.Can anyone find out the solutin?Thanks

Decline reason:

You need to disable the use of Opera's VPN if you wish to edit here. Yamla (talk) 12:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to List of television stations in Bangladesh appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you.

P.S. Please note that Wikipedia is not a web host, user pages should not contain excessive personal information not related to Wikipedia.—J. M. (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on 2021 Bangladesh Women's Football League

Hello am Barris and I noticed that you created an article which has insufficient content to stay in mainspace. It has been tagged for speedy deletion by an editor. If you wish to work more on the article, I can move it to draft to give you more time and space to work on the article. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris, Faster than me. Maybe it's better to move it to draft and notify her. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 06:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShohagS, The author has requested it to be deleted from the message on my talk page. So let’s leave the CSD tag as it is or do you have something in mind? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris, I think If she worked on the page, It would be better. As It's our country thing, I would love to contribute. But here needs her opinion. I request her to work on the page. Thanks. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 06:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShohagS, If you have enough knowledge on the subject and you would be happy to contribute, I guess it better, should I move it to your user-space or draft? Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris, Hold on a sec. She might have something to talk in my talk page. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 06:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris, I don't have much knowledge on sports, But I can help. I mean I can never do this types of thing alone. And I don't think that she wills to. And you already did it. Anyway, thanks. Have a good night. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 07:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShohagS, I wish I could help, but I don’t know much about Southern Asia. It’s actually not a good night for me but a good morning. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris, Thank you very much for that. And also sorry. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 07:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page 2021 Bangladesh Women's Football League

I nominated the page for deletion. Sorry for that. But if you are working on that page please replace all the other tags with {{underconstruction}}. Feel free to get help. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 06:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Always cite reliable sources

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Khaleda Zia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No its fine.I have got photo of her passport.Thats why I have changed. Rehana Hawladar (talk) 16:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synoman Barris Hello I would like to know how many edit I have count to be extended confirm user?I have edited 751 but I did not seen under the my name?

@Synoman Barris: Hi friend.Can I know how much edit have I reached to listed as Extended confirm users.I have totall edited 751.But I have not seen that I am extended confirm users under my name.Thanks.

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:SR Alamgir Khan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SR Alamgir Khan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mz7: Hi good morning.How are you.I cannot able to edit why?I am using my account.Why I am block editing.SR Alamgir Khan who from where?Why for him my account affected?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rehana Hawladar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there what wrong with my account.Since 30 minutes I cannot able to edit.Why my account is disable?Who is SR Alamgir Khan?Please unblock me? Thanks. Hello please unblock me.I am waiting to edit.For someone mistake I cannot block.Think about it? Hello my friend please unblock me.Don't block me.SR Alamir Khan not me.For him I cannot block.Thinks about it

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it. If you have not used another account, you will have to give a plausible explanation as to why evidence would indicate otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rehana Hawladar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi what proof do you have that I use muticple account?There is no limitation of edting of someone work?So if there have any law about it just tell us 1st before block.That law of Wikipedia is too much shit

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rehana Hawladar: It is very obvious that the previously blocked socks and you are the same person. Anyone who reads the numerous unblock requests on their talk pages and their repeated (and even self-admitted) lies will necessarily come to the same conclusion even without a checkuser evidence. But there is also checkuser evidence that confirms it.

I would just like to add that pathological lying is by itself a reason to block a user indefinitely. Just forget about editing Wikipedia, you have lost the right a long time ago. And if you have at least some dignity left, please stop lying and submitting these unblock requests. You won't fool anyone, it will only make you look worse.—J. M. (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 2020–21 Bangladesh Women's Football League

The page 2020–21 Bangladesh Women's Football League has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (SR Alamgir Khan) in violation of ban or block

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]