User talk:RegularBreaker

January 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zoe Saldana. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

I reported you to ANI. Joe Chill (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that you aren't Silverlife? I highly doubt that and if so, the SPI should take care of it. Or are you saying that you didn't attack anyone as Silverlife even though you attacked zodiac groups, admitted to attacking me, used an IP to reverse the removal of personal attacks on your user pages, and called Hell in a Bucket an ogre? Joe Chill (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Silverlife, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Atama頭 21:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Good Luck Charlie Cast.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Good Luck Charlie Cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Epic Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Epic Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]