User talk:Regregex

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Regregex}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Diagrams for Computation of CRC

Hallo Regregex. Please can you describe some more of the diagram that you would like to have made for Computation of CRC? Cuddlyable3 (talk) 10:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo again. Did you really see and fix moire on the Fibonacci LFSR diagram? It really IS 351 not 350 pixels wide. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but being only 1 pixel out it's a giant, subtle moiré. I saw the sides were sharp but the middle was blurred. It's more noticeable on LCD screens. -- Regregex (talk) 10:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At offset 6_h: in the header of LFSR-F16.gif the word 5F 01 i.e. 15F_h states that the width is 351.^[1] It happens that this diagram started life as LFSR-F16.bmp in which it is easy to count the pixels (because no compression) and was later converted to a .gif (lossless compression) for Wikipedia using The Gimp. (A .png was also possible but .gif was the only format for the animated diagram.) -- Cuddlyable3 (talk) 19:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Ref. http://members.aol.com/royalef/gif89a.txt page 8, Logical Screen Descriptor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cuddlyable3 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not disputing that the image file Image:LFSR-F16.gif is 351 px wide. I haven't changed it in any way. I only edited the image tag in the article from 350 px to 351 px so that its width matched the width of the image. Prior to that the server was scaling the image and displaying 350px-LFSR-F16.gif (URI is from the HTML page source of the previous revision.) The blurring is a permanent feature of that thumbnail. If I hadn't looked at the source .gif I would have found out it was 351 px wide by trying 349 px and finding the moiré got worse. HTH. -- Regregex (talk) 23:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have put 2 animations at Computation of CRC. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They look great, thanks again. -- Regregex (talk) 22:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High bit omitted in Cyclic redundancy check

I suggest, if I may, adding something like "High bit omitted" to the representations column title in the crc table. I googled into the table without reading the entire article and missed that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.118.76.130 (talk) 06:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Regregex/User computer age 30

User:Regregex/User computer age 30, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Regregex/User computer age 30 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Regregex/User computer age 30 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Otterathome (talk) 21:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding an edit summary in Cyclic redundancy check

Regregex, In response to your question, I am not interested in becoming a regular contributor so I have not set up an account. Two years ago I noticed in the discussion that someone asked what code CRC 32 IEEE represented. I answered the Hamming Code. Someone else copied that response and put it on the page. At that time the page cited my paper with Joe Hammond as the source of the CRC. That is true. This week I noticed that someone had changed that to Joe's Rome Air Development Center (RADC), now called Rome Labs. report. So I edited it to put in the full set of sources. Joe and I had separate AF contracts so we had to produce separate final reports but we worked together, each doing a part of the work and then we published a joint paper in the open literature. Joe and I were co developers and I wanted that to be clear. I am ok with your edit relocating the discussion. Signed: Kenneth Brayer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.95.96 (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the illuminating info. Happy editing, however much you wish to do! -- Regregex (talk) 11:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://twiki.riteme.site/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you!

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 09:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why I deleted DOI 100.2/ADA014825 from Cyclic redundancy check

http://www.dtic.mil/srch/doc?collection=t3&id=ADA014825 states this: Handle / proxy Url: No Full Text PDF Available So, the military has not actually assigned a doi for this. You are right, that if it had a doi, then it would be 100.2/ADA014825. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AManWithNoPlan (talk • contribs) 21:46, 24 February 2011

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Regregex. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk) 11:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and 'yum'! re/greg/ex;{mbox|history} 00:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copying of content from BeebWiki

You are invited to join the discussion at [[1]]. -- Trevj (talk) 11:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. re/greg/ex;{mbox|history} 00:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disc Filing System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Machine-readable postal marking

I have created a disambiguation page for machine-readable postal markings. (Originally I created it as a redirect to category:postal markings.) The U.S. postal service uses 5 types that I know of:

POSTNET
PLANET
Facing Identification Mark
Intelligent Mail barcode
Integrated data servers, Integrated data systems or Identification Code Tracking (orange barcode on the back of envelopes), used as part of the Remote Bar Coding System.

Please feel free to add a request for this fifth one to WP:RA. Bwrs (talk) 05:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I'm mainly interested in the first-gen phosphor dot codes, if you have any information. re/greg/ex;{mbox|history} 20:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Symbols by color has been nominated for discussion

Category:Symbols by color, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:47, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Regregex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Regregex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Regregex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ [2] page 8, Logical Screen Descriptor

[1] [2] page 8, Logical Screen Descriptor

[1]