User talk:Refluxdonut

Draft move

When I said it's not ready, I meant it's not ready. You didn't make any changes or improvements, you just moved it back into mainspace. Don't do that.

And to make sure you don't do that, I've move-protected the draft. You can work on improving it. DS (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DragonflySixtyseven User:DragonflySixtyseven ! I'm sorry for jumping the gun. I would like to thank you for taking your time for my draft. I had included sources for all the previously unsourced facts which you had deleted. Kindly go through my draft when time permits.

Draft:Milen Manoj Earath Awaiting for your valuable feedback. Thanking you, Refluxdonut (talk) 12:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello User: DragonflySixtyseven!

I wanted to know if I'm allowed to ask if you can unprotect the draft? If possible?

Kindly reply, Thanking you, Refluxdonut (talk) 12:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's necessary to unprotect this draft. You can improve your draft as much as you want and if you feel it's ready for mainspace click the submit button. Masum Reza^📞 10:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Got it. Thank you for writing,

Refluxdonut (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milen Manoj Earath (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cameron11598 was:

While notability seems to be there, and the sources seem to be adequate the article's tone seems to be the main issue.

The article seems more like a promotional work or resume. In particular the achievements section doesn't seem to be written from a tone you would expect with an encyclopedia.

I think these issues are fixable but may require a comprehensive rewrite.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Milen Manoj Earath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Milen Manoj Earath, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Refluxdonut! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Refluxdonut. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Masum Reza^📞 09:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Masumrezarock100 for the warm welcome! Enjoyed the cookies' every little bit😆

Refluxdonut (talk) 15:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Refluxdonut! You created a thread called Tone of text in my draft at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milen Manoj Earath

Hi. I did some work on Draft:Milen Manoj Earath. The changes can be seen here. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 16:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:AlanM1

Thank you for taking a look at my draft: Milen Manoj Earath. Appreciate your help. There is a wee problem with the lead section that you had editted. Unfortunately these 8 grades do not refer to the Indian education system, but to the grading system of Trinity College, London. So, it has to be mentioned as '8 grades'. Also, in the place from where the subject is from, Earath, refers to a big family of people, and refering to the subject as 'Earath' introduces an element of ambiguity because it can refer to any member of that particular family. Kindly advice. Thanking you, Refluxdonut (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to the name issue, it is true that most surnames refer to multiple people, but because the article is about this particular Earath, it is mostly unambiguous because of the context. It's generally more formal to use the surname, and it is Wikipedia's policy per the MoS for India. I checked a couple of other Indian BLP articles, Pranab Mukherjee, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Indira Gandhi, and Rajiv Gandhi, to verify that was the usual style here, too. I gathered counts of first+last/first_only/last_only, ignoring notes/refs/etc.: 47/17/110, 54/54/215, 25/4/120, 12/3/103. A lot of the first+last instances are reasonably explained as honorary naming of things, ambiguous discussion of other people with the surname, etc., but first_only is clearly unusual (in these articles, anyway). It might be worth a discussion at WP:WikiProject India or WT:MOS if you feel strongly that it is unbearably awkward.

As far as the grades, I tweaked it a bit more for clarity here – have a look. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 23:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlanM1 Ok, got that. I checked the other articles you had mentioned, it's true that now it sounds more formal and encyclopedic. Thank you. Regarding the grades: in Trinity's system, first comes an initial grade before the 8 grades, which is not usually counted into the syllabus. By their system, it's as if the initial grade acts as grade 0 before stepping into grade 1. Do you suggest to refer to those as eight 'initial' grades or just as eight grades ?

Thank you for your time, Refluxdonut (talk) 07:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Sorry about that. I mis-read the TCL article. Assuming the Initial Grade was part of the 1.5 years, how about something like "... youngest Indian to complete the Initial Grade and Grades 1–8 (in a span of just 1.5 years), ATCL, LTCL ..."? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 08:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlanM1, no problem, yes, I think that would be the best option. But the problem is that though by Trinity's system, an initial grade exists before the grades 1 to 8, none of the sources indicate a word about the initial grade. Would it cause problems ? If not, then your suggested sentence would be great. Thanking you, Refluxdonut (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the details! I would just suggest changing "all eight grades" to "Grades 1–8", since there are actually nine grades. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 18:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlanM1, got that. I thank you very much for your time and for the valuable feedback. Do you think the draft will be accepted? Sincerely, Refluxdonut (talk) 18:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, really. I've not been involved much in new articles, especially about pianists. My focus is on technical style, markup, etc. I'll keep an eye on it and help out if I can. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 23:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you very much. Really appreciate it. 😊 Sincerely, Refluxdonut (talk) 09:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. User:AlanM1, I just forgot. Is the lead section good? Can the template be removed? If not, kindly advice. Thank you 😊

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milen Manoj Earath has been accepted

Milen Manoj Earath, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Steven Crossin ^{Help resolve disputes!} 14:07, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]