Jump to content

User talk:Redthoreau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Who the silent man can prize,
If a fool he be or wise?
— Today's Motto of the Day



WELCOME

[edit]


    Click here for  Redthoreau's Nuggets of Wiki Wisdom    




Everyone Likes Praise   ...

[edit]

I admire the extraordinary work you have done.

— Taifarious1, June 5, 2008

I just wanted to give ya a quick shout out and thank you for all the hard work you've been putting in.

— J.D., October 31, 2008

I appreciate your willingness to respond to criticism.

— Coppertwig, January 11, 2009

(Here is A Barnstar of Peace) For being deeply kind, and reaching out to me!

— Mattisse, February 6, 2009

You have been good at putting an NPOV eye on communism related pages, and are adept at seeing POV patterns.

— Die4Dixie, October 9, 2009

I like your image gallery.

— Dr. Blofeld, January 30, 2010

I like your work.

— Jrtayloriv, February 28, 2010

Good effort on expanding that page. Nice one!

— ValenShephard, May 10, 2010

Nice job so far.

— Cirt, June 13, 2010

This is a well written article.

— Karbinski, June 18, 2010

I appreciate your cooperation, maturity, and understanding.

— Financestudent, October 1, 2010

(Redthoreau) would make a very good admin.

— Inka 888, November 3, 2010

... intelligent and skilled as an editor, level-headed and thoughtful. Good responses.

— Tony Fox, November 3, 2010

Redthoreau has shown to be a civil editor with plenty of experience.

— Derild4921, November 3, 2010

I think Redthoreau would do a good job of administering the site according to policy.

— WereSpielChequers, November 4, 2010

An honest, intelligent, knowledgeable, and productive contributor.

— Extransit, November 4, 2010

Redthoreau is clearly a good editor.

— Lear's Fool, November 4, 2010

I believe that promoting Redthoreau to a sysop would be a net plus to the project.

— MC10, November 4, 2010

I congratulate you for escaping with your dignity intact.

— Tyrol5, November 4, 2010

Nicely written closing statement.

— Clovis Sangrail, November 4, 2010

... another good wikipedian.

— Dave, November 5, 2010

I think you have a lot to offer as an editor, with your extensive knowledge and quick access to references.

— Coppertwig, December 11, 2010

Love the Nuggets of Wiki Wisdom.

— The Bushranger, December 12, 2010

You have made my Wiki-experience a little less forgettable.

— Pablozeta, February 11, 2011

I think your contribution to wikipedia is huge, intelligent and interesting.

— Offiikart, June 14, 2011



... and Thank You's  

[edit]

Many thanks for your participation in my recent RfA ... (I) will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations.

— Jbmurray, May 18, 2008

Thanks for responding in such a civil manner ... Thanks once more for being so reasonable about this.

— Chris Cunningham (not at work), December 18, & 19 2008

Thanks for providing me other perspectives from notable sources.

— Editor br, January 14, 2009

Thanks for your understanding.

— CRETOG8, February 3, 2009

Thank you for your very kind response.

— Mattisse, February 4, 2009

Thanks for your extensive and valuable contributions to this encyclopedia.

— Coppertwig, March 4, 2009

Thank you so much for taking the time!

— Midnightdreary, March 20, 2009

Thanks for participating. You did a great job at exposing all of the issues.

— Likeminas, May 13, 2009

Thanks for your advice on my talk page. Much appreciated.

— If I were a carpenter, May 15, 2009

Thanks. Its very much appreciated. I'll do all I can to help.

— Jacob Richardson, July 8, 2009

Thanks for your participation in my recent RfA. I will do my very best not to betray the confidence you have shown me.

— Maunus, August 19, 2009

Thanks for that ... thanks for listening / reading.

— PeterWD, September 23, 2009

Thanks for your note, cheers.

— Kaisershatner, April 7, 2010

Thank you for this addition. A major improvement.

—  Fat&Happy, August 23, 2010

Thanks for trying to restore some sanity to the article ... your effort is appreciated.

— Arjuna, August 27, 2010

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the discussion.

— Pablozeta, October 31, 2010

Thanks for your help!

— NickCT, November 7, 2010

Thank you! appreciate that. You have a lot of great stuff on that page, much of which I haven't seen before.

— Antandrus, December 10, 2010

Thanks! That's very kind.

— William Pietri, December 10, 2010

Thank you for incorporating my comment about the tags in your collection!

— Maxl, December 10, 2010

Wow, thanks Redthoreau ... glad it strikes you as "wise"!

— Pete, December 10, 2010

Thanks for telling me.

— Hans Adler, December 19, 2010

Thank you. You also taught me what to do.

—  Flyer22, July 6, 2011

Thanks for the heads up.

—  Malik Shabazz, September 4, 2011

Sweet article! Thanks!.

—  Byelf2007, August 26, 2012




- I do not archive discussions and delete them when they are no longer active or relevant -
If a participating editor is not finished with the conversation I have removed, then please revert me until you feel it is completed.
A full historical record is nevertheless preserved in the page's history and can be retrieved if desired.



LEAVE ME A MESSAGE BELOW

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Objectivism's rejection of the primitive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivism's rejection of the primitive (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RL0919 (talk) 15:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]