User talk:RedsIndependent

The piece I deleted from [Reds United]] is irrelevant rubbish. RedsIndependent (talk) 17:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter, I win the edit war!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 13.16.137.11 (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Reds United. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.

The piece I deleted from the Reds United page is pure and utter crap and someone for some unbeknown stupid reason put it back in. What relevance do you think this piece of information has "Former Reds United right-sided midfield player, Pat Kelly is the grandfather of current St.Martin's right-sided midfielder, Joe Kelly." ?????????? RedsIndependent 12:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be civil please, the edit makes perfect sense. And for the record that piece of information has great relevance to this article.

The comment is useless. Who is St.Martin's right-sided midfielder, Joe Kelly? RedsIndependent 20:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The comment is not useless, get your facts straight. Joe Kelly is one of St. Martins most successful players of all time. The fact that he is related to a former Reds United player warrants mentioning here.

Who are you? And who the hell are St Martin's? RedsIndependent 14:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only discovered this article today, and I can assure you that any connections Reds United have to St. Martins deserve mentioning here. I suspect you may not be the biggest St. Martins fan (more an Athletic FC fan myself), but you must see the importance of this comment - especially if it relates to Joe Kelly, arguably St. Martins' greatest player of all time. Kind regards, FAI King. FAIKing 12:57, 07 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, RedsIndependent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Boothy443 | trácht ar 00:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Irish Football

I'm just alerting your attention to the WikiProject on Irish football as you may be interested in taking part. Danny Invincible^Talk|Edits 15:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raheny United F.C.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Raheny United F.C., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Raheny United F.C.

I have nominated Raheny United F.C., an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raheny United F.C.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transport F.C.

The article Transport F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

amateur sporting club, lacks 3rd party references, does not meet general notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transport F.C.

The article Transport F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of how this article may meet notability guidelines. Lacks 3rd party references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RedsIndependent! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Brian Flood - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul Newe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Newcastlewest F.C.

The article Newcastlewest F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, local, amateur football team. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Newcastlewest F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newcastlewest F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastlewest F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Newe

The article Paul Newe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, has not played for a club in a fully professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Newe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Newe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Newe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dermot Keely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dermot Keely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dermot Keely until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jellyman (talk) 21:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]