User talk:Redpepper1952
Italian WWI Vet
[edit]Could you include a reference to the death of that veteran? They'll revert if without a reference. Czolgolz (talk) 21:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- The World's Oldest People forum is not considered a reliable source. Please wait until a proper obituary surfaces as, per Wikipedia's policies on the biographies of living people, death dates cannot be added without a reliable source. I will revert your changes until a proper obituary can be found. As someone once said wisely, "Wikipedia has little to gain from being the fastest and much from being the most accurate." Cheers, CP 00:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Canadian Paul; You may state that the World's Oldest People site is not considered a reliable source, but I disagree. Furthermore, who decides on how reliable it is anyway?
I deem it to be just as reliable as this site, particulary as it was only there that a mention of Mr. Carmelo Bertolami's passing was first stated. Why did no one on this site report it so to speak, as it occurred some 5 weeks ago? As for the date, it still puzzles me why it went unreported that long at all. The time lapse makes the chances slim of an obituary, unless one can be located in newspaper archives, as a example. At any rate, it appears to be a fact as it stays on here. Redpepper1952 (Another Canadian) 22:00, 10 December 2007
Nomination of List of veterans of World War I who died in 2008 for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of veterans of World War I who died in 2008 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of veterans of World War I who died in 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)