Jump to content

User talk:Reddysteddybrekky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Reddysteddybrekky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

FM104

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at FM104. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 21:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


neutral?? its factual! search the following terms in google, adrian kennedy phoneshow skanger and/or chav knacker. i beg to differ with your point. Reddysteddybrekky 21:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Regarding the vandalism comment I made in the edit summary reverting yor edits, I was referring to edit], where you changed the name of a programme to "The Open Shite". Really, that was vandalism.
But getting back to the neutrality problem, are you actually arguing that skanger is a non-neutral term, especially in this context. For that matter, have you any reliable sources that the listeners to the show are "skangers, its principal target audience", as you claim? For example, does a JNLR survey ask people if they are skangers? FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I agree that the 'Open Shite' edit warranted action. Now re the Adrian Kennedy phoneshow. I see you have sought some citations, fair enough, I will begin to source some. Any that cant be sourced to a high standard, I will seek to reach a consensus regarding a rewording of the section. Reddysteddybrekky 10:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]