User talk:Reddragonawakens

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Reddragonawakens! Thank you for your contributions. I am Madalibi and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Madalibi (talk) 12:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Religious symbol may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|[Taoism]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing, including edit warring at Han Chinese and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have increased the duration of your block to one month for sock puppetry.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reddragonawakens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Personal attacks? SInce when have I veer personally attacked one user? I should not be blocked indefinitely, this is despicable, all I have done was got into a conflict with another wikipedian that caused an 'edit war'. I did not create any sock puppets mind you, and I have not been on to wikipedia for the past 2 months. I have been waiting patiently for my account to be finally unblocked, but was shocked to find out that my account's block was increased from a one month to forever. I don't think this is a fair way of punishment, if you feel that i have done something wrong again, at least increase the block to two months and not permanently block my account, after all I have been not only a contributor of wikipedia on english and mandarin pages, but also one that would actually spends time doing research before editing a wiki page. I hope that my reasonings have changed the administrator's mind and hope that he or she will be fair and kind person who will give chances to new editors.

Decline reason:

This edit was a personal attack. Otherwise, I have confirmed that a combination of behavioural and checkuser evidence indicates that it is very likely that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 00:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reddragonawakens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well then how do you know if it isn't other users trying to frame me by creating accounts and then changing them. This is bullshit, that administrator has no evidence to proof that I am responsible for committing "multiple sock puppetry". How can one administrator, whom I believe is mentally challenged, be the supreme judge, I mean there has to be at least three judges or maybe a jury.Reddragonawakens (talk) 08:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can believe what you like, but posting like that comment about the blocking administrator is a personal attack. Please show us where the rules of Wikipedia, which apply here, require three judges or a jury. Any administrator can block a user from editing for any period from a minute to indefinite (not 'forever'). Peridon (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well my apologies, I guess I didn't read all the rules of wikipedia carefully you fucking retarded big long dick nose no culture norwegian piece of shit.