User talk:Redder rose

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Magic Tree House series, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Magic Tree House series was changed by Redder rose (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-17T20:02:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Syrthiss (talk) 18:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page St Aubyn's School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Wikipedia:Huggle. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to St Aubyn's School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 14:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Readingmad. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 14:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redder rose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account got hacked

Decline reason:

Vandalism-only account. If it is actually hacked, then it must remain blocked. Kinu ^t/_c 17:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redder rose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I did vandalise Magic Book Tree house page but i did not do the rest my roomate-Kenny did most of it i was stupid enough to tell him my password and i promise nothing like this will ever happen again.So when you review my descision please take the fact i did a lot of good edits too. All left lies with God

Decline reason:

Basically, all you have done is vandalism and sockpuppetry, and as Kinu pointe out, a hacked account will never be unblocked. Favonian (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redder rose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please guys focus on the good edits i also made not just what kenny did

Decline reason:

Doesn't matter. Per compromised, a hacked account will never ever be unblocked Jac16888 ^Talk 17:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.