User talk:RedPillBlues

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Memories (Maroon 5 song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Valentine and Matt Flynn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hands All Over (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shellback.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Band members section discussion

I started a discussion on the Twenty One Pilots talk page so we can discuss this dispute and hopefully end it/reach a consensus. Bowling is life (talk) 00:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 15:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Checkusers are given discretion to check an account, but must always do so for legitimate purposes. Broadly, checks must be made only in order to prevent or reduce potential or actual disruption, or to investigate credible, legitimate concerns of bad faith editing." Nothing has been disrupted, and no edits have been made in bad faith. I am not a "sock puppet account". There are 8 Billion people in the world. The liklyhood that I edit the same articles or similar articles of another individual are INCREDIBLY LIKELY. I have 0 other Wikipedia accounts. I kindly ask that you provide me with "evidence" to prove otherwise. RedPillBlues (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret@ Jpgordon This is defamation of character! RedPillBlues (talk) 04:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NLT. --Yamla (talk) 10:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is this a legal threat? I have threatened nothing. Why are you all conspiring against me? What is your problem? I have done nothing and I deserve to see any evidence on the contrary. RedPillBlues (talk) 11:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're evading your community ban. You will always be blocked and your edits reverted until you address that. -- ferret (talk) 12:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus. Fine. It's me. I have requested an unblock so many times. I got told to address it and I did and I was genuine and guess what? It was denied! I have done nothing but provide good edits in my time here and I don't understand why I can't just better this website in peace. I am not hurting anyone or anything. RedPillBlues (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you'd think feigning innocence would work, but the answer is WP:SO as always. Wait six months with zero further evasion and write an appeal on your original account. As you're community banned, that will go to the community to decide. -- ferret (talk) 16:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took the "Standard Offer". I did everything that was asked of me and yet I was refused. Nothing I have done is harming the website- reverting my edits and keeping me banned is doing more harm than good. RedPillBlues (talk) 12:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any appeals on your main account since your original block, so no, you haven't. SO is not "wait six months then make a new account". It's "wait six months then make an appeal". And if it's rejected, you're still blocked, and you still aren't allowed to edit. -- ferret (talk) 13:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a private appeal shortly after my original block and one roughly 7 months after. RedPillBlues (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedPillBlues (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very confused as to why I was blocked. I provide only constructive edits that are adapted from sources in the article or from sources that I add. I have not done anything wrong! RedPillBlues (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.