User talk:RedBull1984

RedBull1984, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RedBull1984! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nick Rimando, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019/Gabriel Rojas (footballer, born 1999)

Hello! A reliable source, e.g. Soccerway, BDFA or a club player profile, is needed to verify Gabriel Rojas' height. As far as I've looked, incl. those examples given, I cannot find anything to support your edits. Transfermarkt isn't considered a RS as it is user generated. R96Skinner (talk) 22:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020/Lucas Chaves

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. R96Skinner (talk) 13:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chechen. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --T*U (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kenny Nagera

Hello RedBull1984. I was just wondering, what is your source for this edit? Thanks. Paul Vaurie (talk) 02:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Ben Sigmund article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 07:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Josh Windass, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 22:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding sources in the edit summary. Please follow inline citation. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gustavo Benítez (footballer, born 1953). Magnolia677 (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Andrey Tveryankin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ... २ तकरपेप्सी _talk 20:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zviad Kupatadze

Hello, RedBull1984,

Thank you for creating Zviad Kupatadze.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

More references necessary to meet notability for sports.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Война правок

На каком основании вы ведёте войны правок на множестве страниц, связанных с Татарстаном? В русской Википедии идёт обсуждение по вопросу президента РТ, вас же уже там остановили. И почему вы упорно удаляете латинскую транскрипцию татарского языка. На сегодняшний день татары официально используют как кириллицу (в России и постсоветском пространстве), арабскую письменность (в Китае), так и латиницу (в остальных странах, в том числе Финляндии, Турции и так далее). Ilnur efende (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Меня никто не остановил, я высказал свою позицию и всё. Дальше пускай сами разбираются. Старицу либо переименуют сейчас либо это сделают после нового года. Татарам в вопросе президента стоит понят, что «перед смертью не надышишься». На каком основании устраиваю войну правок? Где?! В английской Википедии ваша «латиница» нафиг никому не сдалась. Подымайте вопрос по поводу латиницы в английской Википедии. Где ваша латиница в русской Википедии? Раз вы постоянно склоняетесь к русской Википедии. RedBull1984 (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Если группа администраторов английской Википедии примет решение по латинице в татарском языке, пусть будет, я не против. Мне на неё плевать. Я за стандарты, а стандарты в английской Википедии таковы, что здесь латиницу не добавляют. Поэтому я и удаляю её. На сегодняшний день войну правок развязываете вы, пришли, отменили без комментариев и АИ свыше 25 правок и вы мне ещё смеете говорить, что я развязываю войну правок?! Я возвращаю исходный вид статьи, который до этого момента ни у кого не вызывал вопросы. Если вы не заметили, то я прекратил отменять ваши правки по поводу статуса президента, так как увидел, что действительно ещё не приняли решения в русской Википедии по этому вопросу. Поэтому как видите, я готов к диалогу, меня в отличии от вас не ослепляет какой то там «татарский национализм», который демонстрируйте вы. Про статус президента вопросов нет, пока не примут решение. Но по поводу латиницы, вот когда решать английские администраторы, что она нужна, пусть остаётся. А пока что нет. И ещё, продемонстрируйте где это меня «остановили» в русской Википедии. Очень интересно посмотреть, а то может я просмотрел :))) что вряд ли! RedBull1984 (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Давайте ссылки ваших стандартов. И прошу без оскорблений. Отменили вклад вы, добавленный ещё три года назад, и не вызывавший вопросов до сих пор, не занимайтесь обманом, можно убедиться просмотрев историю правок. По вашим нарушениям правил подана заявка, подождем итога.--Ilnur efende (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted a request about your edits

Hi! The rules require from me to notify you about my request to administrators. --Bolgarhistory (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now that it's over, can you please stop making those edits to other articles and find a place to reach some sort of consensus without edit warring? If you keep going like this I will consider those edits disruptive as they are not serving to promote collegiality among editors, and they are costing you the good faith of your peers. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте Daniel Case. Увидел у вас на странице, что вы свободно владеете русским, поэтому могу ли я общаться с вами через русский язык?

Да, но мне потребуется некоторое время, чтобы ответить. Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Начнём с того, что я не просто так убираю «татарскую латиницу» из статей. Во первых нет авторитетных источников информации подтверждающий, что написанные на «татарской латинице» имена и названия правдивы. Во вторых как минимум два администратора английской Википедии не поддержали идею «татарской латиницы». В третьих большинство татар проживает на территории России, и не смотря на это даже в русской Википедии нет места для «татарской латиницы». А то что один из участников привёл мне пример, что татары используют латиницу где то там в Финляндии, так там татарский язык не имеет административного статуса. В России, где у татарского языка есть хоть какой то статус, латиницу не используют ни в Википедии, ни в повседневной жизни.

Как видите я не какой то там вандал, который просто так удаляет по прихоти «татарскую латиницу». Какие то два малоопытных участника пришли и вставляют «латиницу» просто так, без обсуждения и авторитетных источников информации, оба участника из России, где в русской Википедии им не удалось пропихнуть «латиницу» и они взялись за английскую Википедию. Что в итоге? Отсутсвие авторитетных источников информации, отрицательное мнение двух администраторов английской Википедии, отсутствие «татарской латиницы» в русской Википедии.

Если группа администраторов английской Википедии придёт к мнению, что она нужна, пусть будет, я ведь не против. Но просто так добавлять латиницу в статьи без источников информации и одобрения администраторов - это плохо. RedBull1984 (talk) 06:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RedBull1984, приведите ссылки и доказательства ваших слов, иначе я имею полагать, что вы занимаетесь подлогом.

Татарская латиница широко используется в Татарстане, в указателях улиц и других объектов, вы пишете, что не используется — это уже враньё с вашей стороны.
Укажите ссылки на поддержку ваших действий в английской Википедии и на стандарты, на которые вы ссылаетесь
и то, что в русской Википедии не удается "пропихнуть", есть у вас ссылки?
Татарская латиница годами используется в Английской Википедии, даже некоторые статьи связанные с татарской культурой имеют названия на татарской латинице (Şüräle, Musa Cälil). А вы недавно пришли и без всяких обсуждений начали все это удалять, с войной правок. --Ilnur efende (talk) 06:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Вы говорите, что я вру. А вы не врёте? Про то что меня там кто то «остановил», про «слепого националиста»? Вы говорите, что я не отвечаю на ваши вопросы, а вы отвечаете на мои?

Надоело это всё… Ведём себя как дикари, ну или как наш президент… Наш диалог ни к чему видимо не приведёт, поэтому предлагаю цивилизованный компромис, про который писал администратор M.Bitton вроде бы когда объяснял вашему коллеге Bolgarhistory почему он не сторонник «татарской латиницы». Добавите в статьи АВТОРИТЕТНЫЕ ИСТОЧНИКИ ИНФОРМАЦИИ, где будет чёрным по белому написано, что вот так вот пишется название района или фамилия человека на татарской латинице, пусть тогда будет, я не против. И хочу заранее предупредить, ваш источник в статье про Шаймиева я удалю, не из принципа или вредности! А во первых это не АИ, проверил на посещаемость, там несколько человек в сутки заходят на сайт всего лишь. Во вторых не понятно на татарской латинице там написано или на турецкой (электронный переводчик предлагал мне выбрать турецкий язык для перевода). Да и вообще, что бы открыть данный источник пришлось VPN включать. Нужны АИ на русском или на английском языках из электронных энциклопедий или популярных сайтов. Но точно не то, что вы добавили в статье про Шаймиева. RedBull1984 (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Я у вас запросил стандарты на которые ссылаетесь, где они? И почему вы без обсуждения удаляете транскрипции? И вопрос, дайте ссылку, что АИ должно быть на русском или английском, и что это за абсурд, что название на татарском языке, должно быть на другом языке? Но начнем с того, чтобы вы ответили на вопросы выше, которые я задавал несколько дней назад. Ilnur efende (talk) 20:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Правила латинской транслитерации, книги, АИ приведены на этой странице. Если у вас имеются проблемы с переводом, то всегда сможете обратиться к переводчику или запросить перевод. В современном мире, думаю, книги по татарской латинской орфографии также можно приобрести.--Ilnur efende (talk) 20:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jean-Michel Moutier. Giant Snowman 20:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Война правок

Правила латинской транслитерации, книги, АИ приведены на этой странице. Если у вас имеются проблемы с переводом, то всегда сможете обратиться к переводчику или запросить перевод. В современном мире, думаю, книги по татарской латинской орфографии также можно приобрести. Ранее я вам уже давал ссылку, и задавал вопросы по вашей деятельности тут, но никакой реакции от вас нет, кроме как войны правок на тему татарского языка, в которой вы вообще, как видно, не разбираетесь.

Ilnur efende (talk) 05:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Nswix (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ramón Llorens. Giant Snowman 09:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Vital moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jorge Vital. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 03:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]