User talk:Red1 D Oon

What caused your article to be deleted is to a large part WP:WEB, and WP:VANITY. If you believe that your group does meet the criteria for inclusion its best to make sure you address the concerns in those articles to stave off potential deleters of new content. Just because the article was deleted now doesn't mean that you can never have an article on that content, but do not simply repost the content that was deleted as it will likely be deleted again. If you want, you can create and article in your userspace and when you get it to a point where it isn't likely to be deleted you can move it out in to articlespace. Syrthiss 18:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since it looks like you are making another attempt at the article, let me drop you some links that might be helpful for improving it.

Welcome

Hello, Red1 D Oon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Syrthiss 22:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Syrthiss for acceptance and this truly warm welcome. I am beginning to understand this WIKI business, and i must say it can be my latest addiction, and shall work at it to avoid the pitfalls u mentioned. Give me a couple more days to digest. It was a long sleepless night from here just now scratching my head. Best Regards Red1 D Oon

Your edits to Compiere

Hello! You recently added a large amount of new material to Compiere. There's unquestionably good information in there. The problem is that it's not credited to any sources. Wikipedia articles must maintain a neutral point of view. It's generally okay for a Wikipedia article on X to say "Joe So-and-so has said that X is the greatest thing since sliced bread"; it's almost never okay for the article to just say "X is the greatest thing since sliced bread". That's making the article itself take a position on its subject, rather than saying what relevant people's positions on the subject are; and that's a line that it's very important that Wikipedia articles don't cross.

Also, you inserted a rather prominent plug for what appears to be your website into the article. When you do that without discussing it first, it will cause many Wikipedia editors to be very skeptical of your motives; many people come to Wikipedia trying to promote themselves or their websites rather than trying to improve the encyclopedia.

You've clearly intelligent and have good writing skills, so I very much hope you decide to stay; but please have a look at Wikipedia policies like Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines#Citing oneself, to make sure that your edits don't cause too much unrest. :) Kickaha Ota 05:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the advice. I agree and accept fully the explanations of the delete. I will think more deeply thru and try again some time later. I have intent of going other subjects of interest to get a hang of it first. Thanks again. Red1 D Oon 10:52, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your nice poste in my discussion page

Hi red1, I am also glad to be part of the Adempiere project where you bring so much energy and enthousiasm. Cheers--Khalid hassani 14:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm challenging some of your edits

See Talk:World Wide Web. --Coolcaesar 06:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Branding strategies

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Branding strategies, by 67.188.36.17 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Branding strategies is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Branding strategies, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Branding strategies itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]