User talk:Reception123

Welcome!

Hello, Reception123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Opabinia regalis (talk) 19:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Following a successful appeal to arbcom, your former account User:Receptie123 has been unblocked and tagged as a former account belonging to you. Please keep in mind that you are expected to use one account only, User:Reception123. If you think you might want to use a legitimate alternate account, such as for editing on public networks, please contact arbcom first. Also, take the time to review policies on the English Wikipedia, as they may have changed since you last edited and are not the same as policies on the Simple Wikipedia where you have been working recently. Thanks. Opabinia regalis (talk) 19:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --Reception123 (talk) 05:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flags of Europe

My contribution is constructive. Greenland is part of North America, no Europe. --188.76.180.142 (talk) 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm getting used to EnWiki again. --Reception123 (talk) 04:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest policy

Hello, Reception123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miraheze (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miraheze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 17:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Reception123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 17:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Email

I can confirm that I am NOT that person, nor the User:Amanda, which is likely the same person. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your confirmation. Reception123 (talk) 11:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Yes, I am. Thanks! – SJ + 16:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but by "Yes" do you mean "Yes, I am this user" or "Yes, I confirm I am not this person". Again, sorry for bothering but I would just like to be able to confirm. Reception123 (talk) 16:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miraheze (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miraheze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. After submitting, I thought about it and wanted to retract, but I did not find where I could do so. Reception123 (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See if you can get a review of Miraheze and other wikifarms by some open knowledge paper / blog. It is clearly the best service available for free-content wikis, and you would both get outside confirmation of where it sits in the universe of wiki hosting, some news publicity, and your first notable cite. A couple of those and a bit more information about the sites using the service (say, a report from the University paper about the classes using student wikis?), and it would make a fine article. – SJ + 15:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sj: Thank you very much for your help! I've tried (and contacted) a few sites with past articles, but haven't had too much success. Maybe you could direct me to some of these blogs / papers that might be interested in writing about wiki services? I will see what I can do about the university. Reception123 (talk) 16:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An apology on Miraheze

Hello, this is GeometryDashFan12 here, aka InspecterAbdel on Miraheze. I am here to owe an apology about sockpuppeting to evade the Miraheze TOU, I am very sorry, because Miraheze is a wonderful website with good staff, and I wont sockpuppet again. I promise that. Also when am I going to get my account back? Because I a turning 13 in March 2020. --a gd fan (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]